Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717201›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Cognitive brain responses during circadian wake-promotion: evidence for sleep-pressure-dependent hypothalamic activations.

Carolin F Reichert, Micheline Maire, Virginie Gabel, Antoine U Viola, Thomas Götz, Klaus Scheffler, Markus Klarhöfer, Christian Berthomier, Werner Strobel, Christophe Phillips and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sleep and Attention in Alzheimer's Disease.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carolin F ReichertCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Micheline MaireCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Virginie GabelCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Antoine U ViolaCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas GötzDepartment of Psychiatry, Public Health Office, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Klaus SchefflerMax-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus KlarhöferDepartment of Medical Radiology, MR-Physics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian BerthomierPHYSIP, Paris, France.
Werner StrobelRespiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christophe PhillipsGIGA-CRC, In Vivo Imaging Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-425X
Eric SalmonGIGA-CRC, In Vivo Imaging Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Christian CajochenCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. christian.cajochen@upkbs.ch.
Christina SchmidtCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two-process model of sleep-wake regulation posits that sleep-wake-dependent homeostatic processes interact with the circadian timing system to affect human behavior. The circadian timing system is fundamental to maintaining stable cognitive performance, as it counteracts growing homeostatic sleep pressure during daytime. Using magnetic resonance imaging, we explored brain responses underlying working memory performance during the time of maximal circadian wake-promotion under varying sleep pressure conditions. Circadian wake-promoting strength was derived from the ability to sleep during an evening nap. Hypothalamic BOLD activity was positively linked to circadian wake-promoting strength under normal, but not under disproportionally high or low sleep pressure levels. Furthermore, higher hypothalamic activity under normal sleep pressure levels predicted better performance under sleep loss. Our results reappraise the two-process model by revealing a homeostatic-dose-dependent association between circadian wake-promotion and cognition-related hypothalamic activity.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmAdultCognitionFemaleHumansHypothalamusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermPolysomnographySleepYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28717201
PMCPMC5514145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.