Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717159›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The essential genomic landscape of the commensal Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003.

Lorena Ruiz, Francesca Bottacini, Christine J Boinett, Amy K Cain, Mary O'Connell-Motherway, Trevor D Lawley, Douwe van Sinderen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Host-associatedCurrent research in food science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Strain-Level Differences ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of essential genes inMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorena RuizSchool of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, National University of Ireland, Cork, Western Road, Ireland.
Francesca BottaciniSchool of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, National University of Ireland, Cork, Western Road, Ireland.
Christine J BoinettWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Amy K CainWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Mary O'Connell-MotherwaySchool of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, National University of Ireland, Cork, Western Road, Ireland.
Trevor D LawleyWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Douwe van SinderenSchool of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Institute, National University of Ireland, Cork, Western Road, Ireland. d.vansinderen@ucc.ie.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBAPC Microbiome Institute · IENational University of Ireland · IE

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100100Medical Research Council G1100100/1Wellcome Trust WT098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifidobacteria are common gut commensals with purported health-promoting effects. This has encouraged scientific research into bifidobacteria, though recalcitrance to genetic manipulation and scarcity of molecular tools has hampered our knowledge on the precise molecular determinants of their health-promoting attributes and gut adaptation. To overcome this problem and facilitate functional genomic analyses in bifidobacteria, we created a large Tn5 transposon mutant library of the commensal Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 that was further characterized by means of a Transposon Directed Insertion Sequencing (TraDIS) approach. Statistical analysis of transposon insertion distribution revealed a set of 453 genes that are essential for or markedly contribute to growth of this strain under laboratory conditions. These essential genes encode functions involved in the so-called bifid-shunt, most enzymes related to nucleotide biosynthesis and a range of housekeeping functions. Comparison to the Bifidobacterium and B. breve core genomes highlights a high degree of conservation of essential genes at the species and genus level, while comparison to essential gene datasets from other gut bacteria identified essential genes that appear specific to bifidobacteria. This work establishes a useful molecular tool for scientific discovery of bifidobacteria and identifies targets for further studies aimed at characterizing essential functions not previously examined in bifidobacteria.

Indexed as

Mutagenesis, InsertionalBacterial ProteinsBifidobacterium breveDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGenes, EssentialGenome, PlantMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenySequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSymbiosisBacterial ProteinsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID28717159
PMCPMC5514069
OpenAlexW2735407975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.