Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717035›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Neurotoxic Concentration of Piperacillin during Continuous Infusion in Critically Ill Patients.

Marie-Charlotte Quinton, Sandra Bodeau, Loay Kontar, Yoann Zerbib, Julien Maizel, Michel Slama, Kamel Masmoudi, Anne-Sophie Lemaire-Hurtel, Youssef Bennis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Charlotte QuintonLaboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Sandra BodeauLaboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Loay KontarDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Yoann ZerbibDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Julien MaizelUniversity of Picardie Jules Verne, INSERM U1088, Amiens, France.
Michel SlamaUniversity of Picardie Jules Verne, INSERM U1088, Amiens, France.
Kamel MasmoudiNeuropharmacology Unit, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Anne-Sophie Lemaire-HurtelLaboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Youssef BennisLaboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France bennis.youssef@chu-amiens.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study included 53 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), with an average age of 69 years, without neurologic disorder before initiation of a continuous piperacillin infusion at the standard dose and who underwent piperacillin serum concentration monitoring. Among them, 23 developed a neurologic disorder for which the piperacillin causality was chronologically and semiologically suggestive. A concentration threshold of 157.2 mg/liter independently predicted neurotoxicity with 96.7% specificity and 52.2% sensitivity and may constitute a limitation when targeting less susceptible pathogens.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical CareCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFemaleHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinTazobactamintensive care unitneurotoxicitysepsistherapeutic drug monitoringβ-lactams

Identifiers

PMID28717035
PMCPMC5571299
OpenAlexW2735527391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.