Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28717013›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Mechanisms of carbon dioxide acquisition and CO

Yusuke Matsuda, Brian M Hopkinson, Kensuke Nakajima, Christopher L Dupont, Yoshinori Tsuji

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Architectural and biochemical advances in understanding microbial COThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evidence for a COThe New phytologist · 2025
    Article
  5. The contribution of biophysical and biochemical COMarine life science & technology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A linker protein from a red-type pyrenoid phase separates with Rubisco via oligomerizing sticker motifs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusuke MatsudaDepartment of Bioscience, School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan yusuke@kwansei.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-4397
Brian M HopkinsonDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Kensuke NakajimaDepartment of Bioscience, School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-6676
Christopher L DupontJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Yoshinori TsujiDepartment of Bioscience, School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan.
Kwansei Gakuin University · JPJ. Craig Venter Institute · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diatoms are one of the most successful marine eukaryotic algal groups, responsible for up to 20% of the annual global CO

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon DioxideDiatomsCarbonCarbon Dioxidecarbonic anhydraseCO2-concentrating mechanismHCO3− transportmarine diatomphotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID28717013
PMCPMC5516112
OpenAlexW2735175665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.