Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28716997›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

GPs' mental wellbeing and psychological resources: a cross-sectional survey.

Marylou Anna Murray, Chris Cardwell, Michael Donnelly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. SUPPORT FOR GENERAL PRACTITONERS DURING COVID-19.The Ulster medical journal · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Examining the Mental Well-Being of Australian Sport Coaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reimagining mental health in primary care: a blueprint for STPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  14. Providing recovery support to wounded, injured, and sick UK military personnel throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marylou Anna MurraySchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.
Chris CardwellSchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast.
Michael DonnellySchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
University of Ulster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe negative impact of work has been the traditional focus of GP surveys. We know little about GP positive mental health and psychological resources.

aimTo profile and contextualise GP positive mental health and personal psychological resources. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional survey of GPs working in Northern Ireland (NI).

methodA questionnaire comprising the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) and measures of resilience, optimism, self-efficacy, and hope, and sociodemographic information was posted to 400 GPs randomly selected from a publicly available GP register.

resultsThe response rate was 55% (n = 221 out of 400). Mean value for GP wellbeing (WEMWBS) was 50.2 (standard deviation [SD] 8) compared to UK vets 48.8 (SD 9), UK teachers 47.2 (SD 9), and the population of NI 50.8 (SD 9). After adjustment for confounding, mean WEMWBS was 2.4 units (95% CI = 0.02 to 4.7) higher in female GPs than males (

conclusionGPs have levels of positive mental health that are comparable to the local population and better than other occupational groups, such as vets and teachers. Male and younger GPs may have most to gain from wellbeing interventions.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedNorthern IrelandOccupational DiseasesPersonal SatisfactionPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnairesoptimismprimary carepsychologicalresiliencesurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28716997
PMCPMC5519126
OpenAlexW2735579352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.