Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28716787›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Can nurse teachers manage student incivility by guided democracy? A grounded theory study.

Mostafa Rad, Hossein Karimi Moonaghi, Eshagh Ildarabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nurse educators’ experiences with student incivility: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mostafa RadSchool of Nursing and Midwifery,Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Hossein Karimi MoonaghiEvidence- Based Caring Research Center, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0496-2306
Eshagh IldarabadiDepartment of Nursing, Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Esfarayen, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManaging incivility in academic settings is among the basic concerns and challenges of most educational systems, including nursing education. Incivility management cannot be considered devoid of disruptive behaviors. However, incivility management is a complexphenomenon upon which few studies are conducted.

objectivesThe present study aims at discovering teachers and students' experiences regarding incivility and developing an approach to manage nursing students' incivility.

designThe present study was conducted based on the qualitative research design of the grounded theory methodology. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at schools of nursing in academic settings in Iran.

participants

methodIn-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted using theoretical and purposive sampling. Constant comparative analysis was used for data analysis.

resultsThe results include four main categories; (1) deterioration of learning; (2) dominant individual and organisational culture; (3) guided democracy; and (4) movement toward professionalism. Guided democracy is recognised as the main basic psychosocial process for incivility management.

conclusionsIncivility management is pursued to help learners develop professional performance. As indicated by the results of the present study, guided democracy is an effective strategy for incivility management in nursing education.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDemocracyIncivilityAdultEducation, NursingFaculty, NursingFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicIranMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchStudents, NursingYoung Adultgrounded theoryguided democracyincivility managementnursingstudentsteachers

Identifiers

PMID28716787
PMCPMC5541586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.