Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28716152›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2017

Development of a theory-informed implementation intervention to improve the triage, treatment and transfer of stroke patients in emergency departments using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): the T

Louise E Craig, Natalie Taylor, Rohan Grimley, Dominique A Cadilhac, Elizabeth McInnes, Rosemary Phillips, Simeon Dale, Denise O'Connor, Chris Levi, Mark Fitzgerald and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Why Veterinarians (Do Not) Adhere to the Clinical PracticeAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Louise E CraigNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Executive Suite, Level 5 deLacy Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, New South Wales, Australia.
Natalie TaylorCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011, Australia.
Rohan GrimleySunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service/Sunshine Coast Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Nambour, QLD, Australia.
Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth McInnesNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Executive Suite, Level 5 deLacy Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosemary PhillipsNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Executive Suite, Level 5 deLacy Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, New South Wales, Australia.
Simeon DaleNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Executive Suite, Level 5 deLacy Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, New South Wales, Australia.
Denise O'ConnorSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, 549 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chris LeviJohn Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Mark FitzgeraldAlfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
Julie ConsidineSchool of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, Administration Building, Room 2-017, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Richard GerratyDepartment of Medicine, Monash University, Neurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth hospital, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia.
N Wah CheungCentre for Diabetes and Endocrinology Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jeanette WardSchool of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine (SEPHPM), University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5, Canada.
Sandy MiddletonNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Executive Suite, Level 5 deLacy Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, New South Wales, Australia. Sandy.Middleton@acu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTheoretical frameworks and models based on behaviour change theories are increasingly used in the development of implementation interventions. Development of an implementation intervention is often based on the available evidence base and practical issues, i.e. feasibility and acceptability. The aim of this study was to describe the development of an implementation intervention for the T

methodsA stepped method for developing complex interventions based on theory, evidence and practical issues was adapted using the following steps: (1) Who needs to do what, differently? (2) Using a theoretical framework, which barriers and enablers need to be addressed? (3) Which intervention components (behaviour change techniques and mode(s) of delivery) could overcome the modifiable barriers and enhance the enablers? A researcher panel was convened to review the list of BCTs recommended for use and to identify the most feasible and acceptable techniques to adopt.

resultsSeventy-six barriers were reported by hospital staff who attended the workshops (step 1: thirteen TDF domains likely to influence the implementation of the T

conclusionsThe TDF was successfully applied in all steps of developing an implementation intervention for the T

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBlood GlucoseBody TemperatureEmergency Service, HospitalGuideline AdherenceHumansInservice TrainingPatient TransferPersonnel, HospitalPractice Guidelines as TopicProfessional RoleProspective StudiesPsychological TheoryQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareSingle-Blind MethodBlood GlucoseBehaviour change techniquesImplementation interventionTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID28716152
PMCPMC5513365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.