Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28716132›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2017

A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.

Remco H A Ebben, Lilian C M Vloet, Renate F Speijers, Nico W Tönjes, Jorik Loef, Thomas Pelgrim, Margreet Hoogeveen, Sivera A A Berben

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. "I just needed help": a qualitative study of patients' experiences with a single responder ambulance.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Remco H A EbbenResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Remco.Ebben@han.nl.
Lilian C M VloetResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Renate F SpeijersResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nico W TönjesResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jorik LoefResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas PelgrimResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Margreet HoogeveenDutch National Sector Organisation for Ambulance Care, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Sivera A A BerbenResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, PO Box 6960, 6503, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
HAN University of Applied Sciences · NLAmbulance Care (Sweden) · SEGGD Zuid Limburg · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process.

methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction.

resultsWe included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%-93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h-48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%-6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6-19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%-3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%-6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card).

conclusionsNon-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesClinical Decision-MakingPatient SafetyPatient SelectionHumansClinical competence [MeSH]Emergency medical services [MeSH]Non-conveyancePatient safety [MeSH]

Identifiers

PMID28716132
PMCPMC5513207
OpenAlexW2735239011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.