Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28716050›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Working for patient safety: a qualitative study of women's help-seeking during acute perinatal events.

Nicola Mackintosh, Susanna Rance, Wendy Carter, Jane Sandall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Employing the arts for knowledge production and translation: Visualizing new possibilities for women speaking up about safety concerns in maternity.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola MackintoshSAPPHIRE Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Centre for Medicine, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. nicola.mackintosh@le.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-6432
Susanna RanceInstitute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK.
Wendy CarterDivision of Women's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane SandallDivision of Women's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of East London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-PSSQRF-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen and their relatives can play an important role in early detection and help seeking for acute perinatal events. Recent UK reports indicate that patient-professional partnership in 'working for safety' can be difficult to achieve in practice, sometimes with catastrophic consequences. This research explored the experiences of women and relatives who had experienced early warning signs about their condition and sought help in escalating care.

methodsSecondary analysis of case study data which included qualitative interviews with 22 women purposively sampled on account of experiencing a step up in care and 4 of their relatives from two NHS Trusts in England during 2010. Analysis focused on the type of safety work participants engaged in, and the opportunities and challenges reported by women and family members when negotiating safety at home and in hospital.

resultsWomen and relatives took on a dual responsibility for self-diagnosis, self-care and seeking triage, whilst trying to avoid overburdening stretched services. Being informed, however, did not necessarily enable engagement from staff and services. The women's narratives highlighted the work that they engaged in to build a case for clinical attention, the negotiations that took place with health care professionals and the strategies women and partners drew on (such as objective signs and symptoms, use of verbal insistence and repetition) to secure clinical help. For some women, the events left them with a lasting feeling that their concerns had been disregarded. Some described a sense of betrayal and loss of trust in an institution they believed had failed to care for them.

conclusionThe notion of 'safety partnerships' which suggests a sense of equality and reciprocity was not borne out by our data, especially with regards to the experiences of teenage women. To enable women and families to secure a rapid response in clinical emergencies, strategies need to move beyond the provision of patient information about warning signs. Effective partnerships for safety may be supported by system level change such as improved triage, continuity of care, self-referral pathways and staff training to address asymmetries of power that persist within the health system.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPerinatal CareAdultEnglandFamilyFemaleHumansNarrationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSelf CareEarly warning signsHelp seekingMaternity careObstetric complicationsObstetric emergencyPatient safetySafety workUser involvement

Identifiers

PMID28716050
PMCPMC5513134
OpenAlexW2727526120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.