Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28716001›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Variant Ranker: a web-tool to rank genomic data according to functional significance.

John Alexander, Dimitris Mantzaris, Marianthi Georgitsi, Petros Drineas, Peristera Paschou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John AlexanderDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Panepistimioupoli, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece. jalexand@mbg.duth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0697-5541
Dimitris MantzarisDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Panepistimioupoli, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Marianthi GeorgitsiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Panepistimioupoli, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Petros DrineasDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, 47907, Indiana, United States.
Peristera PaschouDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Panepistimioupoli, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing volume and complexity of high-throughput genomic data make analysis and prioritization of variants difficult for researchers with limited bioinformatics skills. Variant Ranker allows researchers to rank identified variants and determine the most confident variants for experimental validation.

resultsWe describe Variant Ranker, a user-friendly simple web-based tool for ranking, filtering and annotation of coding and non-coding variants. Variant Ranker facilitates the identification of causal variants based on novelty, effect and annotation information. The algorithm implements and aggregates multiple prediction algorithm scores, conservation scores, allelic frequencies, clinical information and additional open-source annotations using accessible databases via ANNOVAR. The available information for a variant is transformed into user-specified weights, which are in turn encoded into the ranking algorithm. Through its different modules, users can (i) rank a list of variants (ii) perform genotype filtering for case-control samples (iii) filter large amounts of high-throughput data based on user custom filter requirements and apply different models of inheritance (iv) perform downstream functional enrichment analysis through network visualization. Using networks, users can identify clusters of genes that belong to multiple ontology categories (like pathways, gene ontology, disease categories) and therefore expedite scientific discoveries. We demonstrate the utility of Variant Ranker to identify causal genes using real and synthetic datasets. Our results indicate that Variant Ranker exhibits excellent performance by correctly identifying and ranking the candidate genes

conclusionsVariant Ranker is a freely available web server on http://paschou-lab.mbg.duth.gr/Software.html . This tool will enable users to prioritise potentially causal variants and is applicable to a wide range of sequencing data.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSoftwareAlgorithmsGene FrequencyGene OntologyGenomicsGenotypeHumansInternetSequence Analysis, DNANext-generation sequencingPrioritisationRanking

Identifiers

PMID28716001
PMCPMC5514526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.