Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715934›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

'First 1000 days' health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: alignment of South African policies with high-quality evidence.

René English, Nazia Peer, Simone Honikman, Aviva Tugendhaft, Karen J Hofman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Costs of common perinatal mental health problems in South Africa.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Tuberculosis in persons with sudden unexpected death, in Cape Town, South Africa.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

René Englisha Health Systems Trust, Health Systems Research Unit , Cape Town , South Africa.
Nazia Peera Health Systems Trust, Health Systems Research Unit , Cape Town , South Africa.
Simone Honikmanc Perinatal Maternal Mental Health, The Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health , University of Cape Town , Cape Town , South Africa.
Aviva Tugendhaftd Priority Cost Effective Lessons for System Strengthening South Africa, School of Public Health , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.
Karen J Hofmand Priority Cost Effective Lessons for System Strengthening South Africa, School of Public Health , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn South Africa (SA), despite adoption of international strategies and approaches, maternal, neonatal and child (MNC) morbidity and mortality rates have not sufficiently declined.

objectivesTo conduct an umbrella review (UR) that identifies interventions in low- and middle-income countries, with a high-quality evidence base, that improve MNC morbidity and mortality outcomes within the first 1000 days of life; and to assess the incorporation of the evidence into local strategies, guidelines and documents.

methodsWe included publications about women and children in the first 1000 days of life; healthcare professionals and community members. Comparators were those who did not receive the intervention. Interventions were pharmacological and non-pharmacological. Outcomes were MNC morbidity and mortality. Authors conducted English language electronic and manual searches (2000-2013). The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) were reviewed. Interventions were ranked according to level of evidence; and then aligned with SA strategies, policies and guidelines. A tool to extract data was developed and used by two authors who independently extracted data. Summary measures from MAs or summaries of SRs were reviewed and the specificities of the various interventions listed. A search of all local high-level documents was done and these were assessed to determine the specificities of the recommendations and their alignment to the evidence.

resultsIn total, 19 interventions presented in 32 SRs were identified. Overall, SA's policymakers have sufficiently included high-quality evidence-based interventions into local policies. However, optimal period of birth spacing (two to five years) is not explicitly promoted nor was ante- and postnatal depression adequately incorporated. Antenatal care visits should be increased from four to about eight according to the evidence.

conclusionIncorporation of existing evidence into policies can be strengthened in SA. The UR methods are useful to inform policymaking and identify research gaps. RESPONSIBLE EDITOR Nawi Ng, Umeå University, Sweden.

Indexed as

Child MortalityChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityMorbidityMortalityPolicyPregnancyPrenatal CareProgram Evaluationchild healthFirst 1000 daysinterventionsmaternalneonatalSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID28715934
PMCPMC5533118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.