Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715554›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2017

Variable Practice to Enhance Speech Learning in Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Single Case Experimental Study.

Jonathan L Preston, Megan C Leece, Kerry McNamara, Edwin Maas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03238677 (Treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03238677 nacompletednot on this map

Treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Role of Biofeedback & Practice Distribution

TypeinterventionalSponsorSyracuse UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled56ConditionsChildhood Apraxia of SpeechArmsSpeech Motor Chaining without Biofeedback, Biofeedback, Distributed Practice, Massed --> Distributed Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computer-assisted challenge point intervention for residual speech errors.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Tongue Part Movement Trajectories for /r/ Using Ultrasound.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan L PrestonSyracuse University, NY.
Megan C LeeceSyracuse University, NY.
Kerry McNamaraSyracuse University, NY.
Edwin MaasTemple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Syracuse University · USHaskins Laboratories · USTemple University · US

Funding

Ultrasound Biofeedback for Therapy-Resistant Speech Sound Disorders in ChildrenR03DC013152 · NIDCD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI PRESTON, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2015
$497k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of practice variability, through prosodic variation during speech sound training, in biofeedback treatment for children with childhood apraxia of speech. It was hypothesized that variable practice would facilitate speech sound learning.

methodSix children ages 8-16 years with persisting speech sound errors due to childhood apraxia of speech participated in a single-subject experimental design. For each participant, 2 speech sound targets were treated with ultrasound visual feedback training: one with prosodic variation (i.e., practicing sound targets in words and phrases spoken fast, slow, loud, as a question, command, and declarative), and one without prosodic variation. Each target was treated for half of the 1-hr session for 14 treatment sessions.

resultsAs measured by standardized effect sizes, all participants showed greater change on generalization probes for sound targets treated under the prosodic variation condition with mean effect sizes (d2) of 14.5 for targets treated with prosodic variation and 8.3 for targets treated without prosodic variation. The average increase in generalization scores was 38% in the prosodic variation condition compared to 31% without.

conclusionsUltrasound visual feedback may facilitate speech sound learning and learning may be enhanced by treating speech sounds with explicit prosodic variation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5150119.

Indexed as

Child LanguageLearningSpeechUltrasonographyAdolescentAge FactorsApraxiasBiofeedback, PsychologyBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleMotor ActivityNew York

Identifiers

PMID28715554
PMCPMC5829796
OpenAlexW2736135633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.