Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715507›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Independent Component Analysis (ICA) based-clustering of temporal RNA-seq data.

Moysés Nascimento, Fabyano Fonseca E Silva, Thelma Sáfadi, Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento, Talles Eduardo Maciel Ferreira, Laís Mayara Azevedo Barroso, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Simone Eliza Faccione Guimarães, Nick Vergara Lopes Serão

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Moysés NascimentoDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-9540
Fabyano Fonseca E SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thelma SáfadiDepartment of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Campana NascimentoDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Talles Eduardo Maciel FerreiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Laís Mayara Azevedo BarrosoDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Camila Ferreira AzevedoDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Simone Eliza Faccione GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nick Vergara Lopes SerãoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression time series (GETS) analysis aims to characterize sets of genes according to their longitudinal patterns of expression. Due to the large number of genes evaluated in GETS analysis, an useful strategy to summarize biological functional processes and regulatory mechanisms is through clustering of genes that present similar expression pattern over time. Traditional cluster methods usually ignore the challenges in GETS, such as the lack of data normality and small number of temporal observations. Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is a statistical procedure that uses a transformation to convert raw time series data into sets of values of independent variables, which can be used for cluster analysis to identify sets of genes with similar temporal expression patterns. ICA allows clustering small series of distribution-free data while accounting for the dependence between subsequent time-points. Using temporal simulated and real (four libraries of two pig breeds at 21, 40, 70 and 90 days of gestation) RNA-seq data set we present a methodology (ICAclust) that jointly considers independent components analysis (ICA) and a hierarchical method for clustering GETS. We compare ICAclust results with those obtained for K-means clustering. ICAclust presented, on average, an absolute gain of 5.15% over the best K-means scenario. Considering the worst scenario for K-means, the gain was of 84.85%, when compared with the best ICAclust result. For the real data set, genes were grouped into six distinct clusters with 89, 51, 153, 67, 40, and 58 genes each, respectively. In general, it can be observed that the 6 clusters presented very distinct expression patterns. Overall, the proposed two-step clustering method (ICAclust) performed well compared to K-means, a traditional method used for cluster analysis of temporal gene expression data. In ICAclust, genes with similar expression pattern over time were clustered together.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNAAnimalsCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalModels, MolecularMuscle, SkeletalSwineTime FactorsRNA

Identifiers

PMID28715507
PMCPMC5513449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.