Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715505›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The clinical and immunological performance of 28 days survival model of cecal ligation and puncture in humanized mice.

Krzysztof Laudanski, Natalia Lapko, Mateusz Zawadka, Benjamin X Zhou, Gwenn Danet-Desnoyers, George S Worthen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reframing sepsis research through translational integrative models.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Humanized Mice as a Tool to Study Sepsis-More Than Meets the Eye.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. New Insights into the Immune System Using Dirty Mice.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Potential Pitfalls of the Humanized Mice in Modeling Sepsis.International journal of inflammation · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Krzysztof LaudanskiDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7373-0851
Natalia LapkoFaculty of Medicine, Ivano-Frankivsk Medical Institute, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
Mateusz Zawadka2nd Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Benjamin X ZhouTechnical College of New Jersey. Ewing, NJ. United States of America.
Gwenn Danet-DesnoyersDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. United States of America.
George S WorthenDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. United States of America.
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCollege of New Jersey · USIvano-Frankivsk National Medical University · UAMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis triggers a coordinated and thorough immune system response with long-term unfavorable sequelae after the initial insult. Long-term recovery from sepsis has garnered increasing attention recently, but a lack of suitable animal models impairs progress in this area. Our study, therefore, aimed to address the performance of the immune system in a survivable model of sepsis (cecal ligation and sepsis; CLP) for up to 28 d after the initial injury in humanized mice. Our model mimics human sepsis with weight loss and post-sepsis hypothermia. Within the first 7 d of sepsis, the M1 inflammatory cell subtype predominated, as evidenced by increased CD16 expression, but at 28 d, a mixed population of M1 and M2 inflammatory cells emerged, as evidenced by increased secretion of transforming growth factor TGFβ and CD206 expression. This change was accompanied by normalized production of interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor TNFα and IL-10 at 28 d. Furthermore, the ability of MO to become regulatory DC or the frequency of endogenous DC were severely affected at 28 days. Thus, sepsis results in profound and persistent changes in the function of myeloid cells up to 28 days after CLP demonstrating the persistence of the new acquired immunological features long after resolution of the sepsis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCecumDendritic CellsDisease Models, AnimalLigationMiceMonocytesPuncturesSepsisSurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28715505
PMCPMC5513410
OpenAlexW2735458765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.