Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715411›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

A curated genome-scale metabolic model of Bordetella pertussis metabolism.

Nick Fyson, Jerry King, Thomas Belcher, Andrew Preston, Caroline Colijn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep longitudinal multi-omics analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. mSphere · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nick FysonDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College, London, UK.
Jerry KingThe Milner Centre for Evolution and Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Thomas BelcherThe Milner Centre for Evolution and Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Andrew PrestonThe Milner Centre for Evolution and Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Caroline ColijnDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-6708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gram-negative bacterium Bordetella pertussis is the causative agent of whooping cough, a serious respiratory infection causing hundreds of thousands of deaths annually worldwide. There are effective vaccines, but their production requires growing large quantities of B. pertussis. Unfortunately, B. pertussis has relatively slow growth in culture, with low biomass yields and variable growth characteristics. B. pertussis also requires a relatively expensive growth medium. We present a new, curated flux balance analysis-based model of B. pertussis metabolism. We enhance the model with an experimentally-determined biomass objective function, and we perform extensive manual curation. We test the model's predictions with a genome-wide screen for essential genes using a transposon-directed insertional sequencing (TraDIS) approach. We test its predictions of growth for different carbon sources in the medium. The model predicts essentiality with an accuracy of 83% and correctly predicts improvements in growth under increased glutamate:fumarate ratios. We provide the model in SBML format, along with gene essentiality predictions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBordetella pertussisFumaratesGenome, BacterialGlutamic AcidHumansMetabolic Flux AnalysisROC CurveWhooping CoughFumaratesGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID28715411
PMCPMC5553986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.