Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715398›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

A Non-invasive Way to Isolate and Phenotype Cells from the Conjunctiva.

Tanima Bose, Aihua Hou, Ryan Lee, Louis Tong, K George Chandy

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanima BoseLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University.
Aihua HouSingapore Eye Research Institute.
Ryan LeeSingapore Eye Research Institute.
Louis TongSingapore Eye Research Institute; Singapore National Eye Center; Duke-NUS Medical School; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine; louis.tong.h.t@singhealth.com.sg.
K George ChandyLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University; gchandy@ntu.edu.sg.
Nanyang Technological University · SGSingapore Eye Research Institute · SGYong In University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, ocular surface cytology is studied with techniques such as spatula technology and brush technology. The problem with these techniques is that they may induce traumatic lesions on the surface of the eye, which can progress to scarring, eyelid deformity, limbal stem cell deficiency and in some cases, cause great discomfort to the subject. To avoid these clinical problems, impression cytology (IC) was developed to diagnose dry eye disease and later neoplasia, atopic disease, vernal keratoconjunctivitis and keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Typically, clinicians manually cut filter papers into required shapes and apply these to the ocular surface. Here, we describe how to perform IC using a commercially available medical device. This technique is explained here followed by immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. This technique requires less manual handling and causes less injury to the ocular surface.

Indexed as

ConjunctivaCytodiagnosisHumansImmunologic TestsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID28715398
PMCPMC5608542
OpenAlexW2725181309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.