Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28715260›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2018

Does Adding Information on Toxic Constituents to Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Smokers' Perceptions About the Health Risks of Smoking? A Longitudinal Study in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

Yoo Jin Cho, James F Thrasher, Kamala Swayampakala, Isaac Lipkus, David Hammond, Kenneth Michael Cummings, Ron Borland, Hua-Hie Yong, James W Hardin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Knowledge and Awareness of Added Sugar in Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  11. An Eye Tracking Study of Anti-Smoking Messages on Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoo Jin Cho1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
James F Thrasher1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Kamala Swayampakala1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Isaac Lipkus3 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
David Hammond4 University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth Michael Cummings5 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Ron Borland6 Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hua-Hie Yong6 Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James W Hardin1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Building evidence for effective and sustainable cigarette warning label policyR01CA167067 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth warning labels (HWLs) on cigarette packs in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the United States include varying information about toxic cigarette smoke constituents and smoking-related health risks. HWL information changed more recently in Australia, Canada, and Mexico than in the United States.

aimsTo investigate whether smokers' knowledge of toxic constituents and perceived smoking-related risks increased after adding this information to HWLs and how knowledge of toxic constituents is associated with perceptions of smoking-related risks.

methodsData come from a longitudinal, online cohort of 4,621 adult smokers surveyed every 4 months from September 2012 (Wave 1) to January 2014 (Wave 5) in Australia, Canada, and Mexico, with the United States being surveyed from Waves 2 to 5. Generalized estimating equation models estimated the association between perceived smoking-related risk at follow-up and prior wave knowledge of toxic constituents, adjusting for attention to HWLs, sociodemographics, and smoking-related characteristics.

resultsBetween 2012 and 2014, knowledge of toxic constituents increased in Australia, Canada, and Mexico ( p < .001), but not in the United States. Higher levels of both attention to HWLs and knowledge of toxic constituents were associated with a higher perceived risk of smoking-related conditions at follow-up across all countries except for the United States.

conclusionsOur results suggest that information about toxic constituents on prominent HWLs not only increases smoker's knowledge of toxic constituents, but that it may also reinforce the effects of HWL messages about specific, smoking-related health outcomes.

Indexed as

PerceptionAustraliaCanadaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProduct LabelingRisk FactorsSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsUnited Statesglobal healthhealth behaviorhealth communicationshealth promotionsmoking and tobacco usetobacco control and policy

Identifiers

PMID28715260
PMCPMC6121743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.