Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28714945›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2017

Impact of molecular residual disease post allografting in myelofibrosis patients.

C Wolschke, A Badbaran, T Zabelina, M Christopeit, F Ayuk, I Triviai, A Zander, H Alchalby, U Bacher, B Fehse and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Are transplant indications changing for myelofibrosis?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Contemporary Approach to CALR-Positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C WolschkeDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
A BadbaranDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
T ZabelinaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
M ChristopeitDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
F AyukDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
I TriviaiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
A ZanderDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
H AlchalbyDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
U BacherDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
B FehseDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
N KrögerDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We screened 136 patients with myelofibrosis and a median age of 58 years who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for molecular residual disease for JAKV617F (n=101), thrombopoietin receptor gene (MPL) (n=4) or calreticulin (CALR) (n=31) mutation in peripheral blood on day +100 and +180 after AHSCT. After a median follow-up of 78 months, the 5-year estimated overall survival was 60% (95% confidence interval (CI): 50-70%) and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 26% (95% CI: 18-34%) for the entire study population. The percentage of molecular clearance on day 100 was higher in CALR-mutated patients (92%) in comparison with MPL- (75%) and JAKV617F-mutated patients (67%). Patients with detectable mutation at day +100 or at day +180 had a significant higher risk of clinical relapse at 5 years than molecular-negative patients (62% vs 10%, P<0.001) and 70% vs 10%, P<0.001, respectively) irrespectively of the underlying mutation. In a multivariate analysis, high-risk diseases status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.5; 95% CI: 1.18-5.25, P=0.016) and detectable MRD at day 180 (HR 8.36, 95% CI: 2.76-25.30, P<0.001) were significant factors for a higher risk of relapse.

Indexed as

CalreticulinHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansJanus Kinase 2Middle AgedMutationNeoplasm, ResidualPathology, MolecularPrimary MyelofibrosisReceptors, ThrombopoietinRecurrenceSurvival RateTransplantation, HomologousCalreticulinCALR protein, humanJanus Kinase 2MPL protein, humanReceptors, Thrombopoietin

Identifiers

PMID28714945
OpenAlexW2735520881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.