Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28714038›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2017

One and two-year persistence with different anti-osteoporosis medications: a retrospective cohort study.

C Reyes, C Tebe, D Martinez-Laguna, M S Ali, A Soria-Castro, C Carbonell, D Prieto-Alhambra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Association of orthogeriatric care models with evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Persistence and adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies: a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Denosumab-efficacy, safety, persistence and sequential strategies-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Drug utilization analysis of osteoporosis medications in seven European electronic health databases.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  15. Real-world evidence: new opportunities for osteoporosis research. Recommendations from a Working Group from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Malaysia.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C ReyesGREMPAL (Grup de Recerca en Epidemiologia de les Malalties Prevalents de l'Aparell Locomotor) Research Group, IDIAP Jordi Gol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), CIBER Fes, Av Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Atic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
C TebeBellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Avinguda Granvia, 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
D Martinez-LagunaGREMPAL (Grup de Recerca en Epidemiologia de les Malalties Prevalents de l'Aparell Locomotor) Research Group, IDIAP Jordi Gol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), CIBER Fes, Av Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Atic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
M S AliMusculoskeletal Pharmaco and Device Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
A Soria-CastroGREMPAL (Grup de Recerca en Epidemiologia de les Malalties Prevalents de l'Aparell Locomotor) Research Group, IDIAP Jordi Gol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), CIBER Fes, Av Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Atic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
C CarbonellGREMPAL (Grup de Recerca en Epidemiologia de les Malalties Prevalents de l'Aparell Locomotor) Research Group, IDIAP Jordi Gol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), CIBER Fes, Av Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Atic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
D Prieto-AlhambraGREMPAL (Grup de Recerca en Epidemiologia de les Malalties Prevalents de l'Aparell Locomotor) Research Group, IDIAP Jordi Gol (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), CIBER Fes, Av Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Atic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain. Daniel.prietoalhambra@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversidad Rovira i Virgili · ESUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications is poor. We carried out a cohort study using a real-world population database to estimate the persistence of anti-osteoporosis drugs. Unadjusted 2-year persistence ranged from 10.3 to 45.4%. Denosumab users had a 40% lower risk of discontinuation at 2 years compared to alendronate users. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate real-world persistence amongst incident users of anti-osteoporosis medications.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort using data from anonymised records and dispensation data ( www.sidiap.org ). Eligibility comprised the following: women aged ≥50, incident users of anti-osteoporosis medication (2012), with data available for at least 12 months prior to therapy initiation. Exclusions are other bone diseases/treatments and uncommon anti-osteoporosis drugs (N < 100). Follow-up was from first pharmacy dispensation until cessation, end of study, censoring or switching. Outcomes are 2- and 1-year persistence with a permissible gap of up to 90 days. Persistence with alendronate was compared to other bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, teriparatide and denosumab. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios of therapy cessation according to drug used after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, Charlson co-morbidity index, previous fractures, use of anti-osteoporosis medication/s, oral corticosteroids and socio-economic status.

resultsA total of 19,253 women were included. Unadjusted 2-year persistence [95% CI] ranged from 10.3% [9.1-11.6%] (strontium ranelate) to 45.4% [43.1-47.8%] (denosumab). One-year persistence went from 35.8% [33.9%-37.7%] (strontium ranelate) to 65.8% [63.6%-68.0%] (denosumab). At the end of the first year and compared to alendronate users, both teriparatide and denosumab users had reduced cessation risk (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86 and 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59 respectively) while at the end of the second year, only denosumab had a lower risk of discontinuation (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.56-0.64).

conclusionsUnadjusted 2-year persistence is suboptimal. However, both teriparatide and denosumab users had better 1-year persistence and only denosumab had 2-year better persistence compared to alendronate users. Unmeasured confounding by indication might partially explain our findings.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDatabases, FactualDenosumabDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabstrontium ranelateTeriparatideThiophenesCohort studyMedication adherenceOsteoporosisPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID28714038
OpenAlexW2734562071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.