ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017
Exploration of the sequential gene changes in epithelial ovarian cancer induced by carboplatin via microarray analysis.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common miRNAs, candidate genes and their interaction network across four subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.Bioinformation · 2021Article
- Genome-wide bioinformatics analysis reveals CTCFL is upregulated in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to explore the carboplatin‑induced sequential changes in gene expression and screen out key genes, which were associated with effects of carboplatin on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The microarray dataset GSE13525 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, including 6 EOC cell samples separately treated with carboplatin at 24, 30 and 36 h (case group), and 6 samples treated with phosphate‑buffered saline at the same time points (control group). A total of 3 sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were respectively identified in case samples at 24, 30 and 36 h compared with the control group via the Limma package, and separately recorded as DEG‑24, DEG‑30 and DEG‑36. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the overlapped DEGs were performed via the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. The protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed and analyzed by Cytoscape software. In addition, the survival curves were drawn to illustrate the association between the expression levels of certain critical genes and the prognosis of EOC. A total of 170, 605 and 1043 DEGs were separately obtained in DEG‑24 DEG‑30 and DEG‑36, and 110 overlaps were identified. The overlaps were enriched in 77 GO terms and 3 KEGG pathways. A total of 152 pairs were involved in the PPI network, and the abnormal expression levels (high or low) of c‑Jun and cyclin B1 (CCNB1) would reduce the survival time of patients with EOC. The study indicated that c‑Jun and CCNB1 may be the prognostic biomarkers of EOC treated with carboplatin, and certain pathways (such as p53 signaling pathway, cell cycle and mitogen‑activation protein kinase signaling pathway) may be involved in carbo-platin‑resistant EOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.