Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28713868›Full record

ArticleJACC. Basic to translational science2016

21st Century Cardio-Oncology: Identifying Cardiac Safety Signals in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Calvin Chen Sheng, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Todd Palmby, Thomas Force, Charles C Hong, Joseph C Wu, Kevin Croce, Geoffrey Kim, Javid Moslehi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Combination ofJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The mRNA expression ofMolecular medicine reports · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Calvin Chen ShengCardiovascular Division, Nashville, Tennessee.
Laleh Amiri-KordestaniCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, Maryland.
Todd PalmbyCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, Maryland.
Thomas ForceCardiovascular Division, Nashville, Tennessee.
Charles C HongCardiovascular Division, Nashville, Tennessee.
Joseph C WuCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Kevin CroceDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hosptial, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Geoffrey KimCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, Maryland.
Javid MoslehiCardiovascular Division, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USHarvard University · USStanford University · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

A Functional Role for Prolyl Hydroxylases (PHDs) in CardiomyopathyK08HL097031 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MOSLEHI, JAVID J · 2009 to 2012
$550k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL097031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiotoxicity is a well-established complication of oncology therapies. Cardiomyopathy resulting from anthracyclines is a classic example. In the past decade, an explosion of novel cancer therapies, often targeted and more specific than traditional therapies, has revolutionized oncology therapy and dramatically changed cancer prognosis. However, some of these therapies have introduced an assortment of cardiovascular (CV) complications. At times, these devastating outcomes have only become apparent after drug approval and have limited the use of potent therapies. There is a growing need for better testing platforms, both for CV toxicity screening, as well as for elucidating mechanisms of cardiotoxicities of approved cancer therapies. This review discusses the utility of nonclinical models (

Indexed as

cardio-oncologycardiotoxicitynonclinical/preclinical models

Identifiers

PMID28713868
PMCPMC5508213
OpenAlexW2509996390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.