Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28713666›Full record

ArticleCurrent plant biology2016

Gramene Database: Navigating Plant Comparative Genomics Resources.

Parul Gupta, Sushma Naithani, Marcela Karey Tello-Ruiz, Kapeel Chougule, Peter D'Eustachio, Antonio Fabregat, Yinping Jiao, Maria Keays, Young Koung Lee, Sunita Kumari and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mining genes regulating root system architecture in maize based on data integration analysis.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Multi-omics intervention inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  16. CerealsDB: A Whistle-Stop Tour of an Open Access SNP Resource.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Exploring synergies between plant metabolic modelling and machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Parul GuptaDepartment of Botany & Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Sushma NaithaniDepartment of Botany & Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Marcela Karey Tello-RuizCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Kapeel ChouguleCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Peter D'EustachioNYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Antonio FabregatEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Yinping JiaoCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Maria KeaysEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Young Koung LeeCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Sunita KumariCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Joseph MulvaneyCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Andrew OlsonCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Justin PreeceDepartment of Botany & Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Joshua SteinCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Sharon WeiCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Joel WeiserOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laura HuertaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Robert PetryszakEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Paul KerseyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory - European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Lincoln D SteinOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Doreen WareCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Pankaj JaiswalDepartment of Botany & Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Funding

Reactome - CoreU41HG003751 · NHGRI · ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI STEIN, LINCOLN D. · 2012 to 2021
$14.5M
TRAININGU54GM114833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L., PING, PEIPEI · 2014 to 2017
$13.8M
Reactome: An Open Knowledgebase of Human PathwaysP41HG003751 · NHGRI · ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI STEIN, LINCOLN D. · 2007 to 2011
$4.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG003751NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG003751NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gramene (http://www.gramene.org) is an online, open source, curated resource for plant comparative genomics and pathway analysis designed to support researchers working in plant genomics, breeding, evolutionary biology, system biology, and metabolic engineering. It exploits phylogenetic relationships to enrich the annotation of genomic data and provides tools to perform powerful comparative analyses across a wide spectrum of plant species. It consists of an integrated portal for querying, visualizing and analyzing data for 44 plant reference genomes, genetic variation data sets for 12 species, expression data for 16 species, curated rice pathways and orthology-based pathway projections for 66 plant species including various crops. Here we briefly describe the functions and uses of the Gramene database.

Identifiers

PMID28713666
PMCPMC5509230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.