ArticleThe journal of physical fitness and sports medicine2017
CDK inhibitors for muscle stem cell differentiation and self-renewal.
Article in The journal of physical fitness and sports medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diverse roles of Hox proteins in the regulation of the cell cycle and their therapeutic value in cancer treatment.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Study on the effect of different types of sugar on proliferation and inflammatory in goose fatty liver.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 contributes to the determination of reserve cells during myogenic differentiation of C2C12 cells.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2024Article
- Cellular and transcriptomic changes by the supplementation of aged rat serum in human pluripotent stem cell-derived myogenic progenitors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Strategies for immortalisation of amnion-derived mesenchymal and epithelial cells.Cell biology international · 2022Review
- Therapeutic values of chick early amniotic fluid (ceAF) that facilitates wound healing via potentiating a SASP-mediated transient senescence.Genes & diseases · 2022Article
- Zika virus disrupts gene expression in human myoblasts and myotubes: Relationship with susceptibility to infection.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Influence of physical exercise on microRNAs in skeletal muscle regeneration, aging and diseases.Oncotarget · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Regeneration of muscle is undertaken by muscle stem cell populations named satellite cells which are normally quiescent or at the G0 phase of the cell cycle. However, upon signals from damaged muscle, satellite cells lose their quiescence, and enter the G1 cell cycle phase to expand the population of satellite cell progenies termed myogenic precursor cells (MPCs). Eventually, MPCs stop their cell cycle and undergo terminal differentiation to form skeletal muscle fibers. Some MPCs retract to quiescent satellite cells as a self-renewal process. Therefore, cell cycle regulation, consisting of satellite cell activation, proliferation, differentiation and self-renewal, is the key event of muscle regeneration. In this review, we summarize up-to-date progress on research about cell cycle regulation of myogenic progenitor cells and muscle stem cells during embryonic myogenesis and adult muscle regeneration, aging, exercise and muscle diseases including muscular dystrophy and muscle fiber atrophy, especially focusing on cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.