ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2017
Evaluation of Two Systems for Fundus-Controlled Scotopic and Mesopic Perimetry in Eye with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal sensitivity changes in early/intermediate AMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of visual field testing under mesopic and scotopic lighting.Eye (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Spatially Resolved Association of Structural Biomarkers on Retinal Function in Non-Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Over 4 Years.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Biomarkers for the Progression of Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Investigating the Spatiotemporal Summation of Perimetric Stimuli in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Test-Retest Variability and Discriminatory Power of Measurements From Microperimetry and Dark Adaptation Assessment in People With Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration - A MACUSTAR Study Report.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Role of microperimetry in evaluating disease progression in age-related macular degeneration: a scoping review.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Focal electroretinogram and microperimetry testing of photoreceptor-retinal pigment epithelium function in intermediate age-related macular degeneration.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Observational
- Infrared- and white-light retinal sensitivity in glaucomatous neuropathy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Spatial Dissociation of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits and Impaired Scotopic and Mesopic Sensitivity in AMD.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Detecting Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy Using Fundus Perimetry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Calculation of test-retest variability in phase I/IIa clinical trials for Inherited Retinal Degenerations.Ophthalmic genetics · 2021Article
- THE LOSS OF INFRARED LIGHT SENSITIVITY OF PHOTORECEPTOR CELLS MEASURED WITH TWO-PHOTON EXCITATION AS AN INDICATOR OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: A Pilot Study.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Article
- Scotopic thresholds on dark-adapted chromatic perimetry in healthy aging and age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Fundus-controlled perimetry (microperimetry): Application as outcome measure in clinical trials.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021Review
- Clinical Perspectives and Trends: Microperimetry as a Trial Endpoint in Retinal Disease.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2021Review
- Structure-Function Analysis in Macular Drusen With Mesopic and Scotopic Microperimetry.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Longitudinal Analysis of Structural and Functional Changes in Presence of Reticular Pseudodrusen Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Clinical Application of Infrared-Light Microperimetry in the Assessment of Scotopic-Eye Sensitivity.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the MP-1S (Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy) and the S-MAIA (CenterVue, Padova, Italy) for mesopic and scotopic fundus-controlled perimetry (FCP) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
methodsEleven eyes from 11 patients underwent mesopic and, after 30 minutes of dark adaptation, scotopic (MP-1S: Goldmann V, 200 ms, background luminance 0.0032 cd/m
resultsThe upper end of the dynamic range (≤4 dB of lowest threshold) was frequently reached by the MP-1S for mesopic testing (median 34 of 56 stimuli), while threshold values within the lower 4 dB of the dynamic range were occasionally found with the S-MAIA for scotopic testing (median 3 for cyan, median 2 for red). After correction of the stimulus intensity for the S-MAIA results, the median difference for all stimuli between both devices for mesopic testing was -2.0 dB (interquartile range [-4;0], range -14 to 6).
conclusionsThe results indicate that robust testing of mesopic and scotopic function is feasible with both devices in patients with AMD, although both devices are susceptible to floor and ceiling effects. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The interpretation and particularly the comparison of both scotopic and mesopic FCP results between the MP-1S and the S-MAIA in AMD eyes need to consider variable susceptibility of floor and ceiling effects. Further software updates are desirable as FCP captures visual functional loss that is not noted with best-corrected central visual acuity and is important for clinical trials in AMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.