Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28713513›Full record

ArticleElectronic physician2017

The prevalence and risk factors of group B streptococcus colonization in Iranian pregnant women.

Roksana Darabi, Sima Tadi, Mitra Mohit, Erfan Sadeghi, Gita Hatamizadeh, Bahareh Kardeh, Mina Etminan-Bakhsh, Yekta Parsa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electronic physician, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaginal Colonization byInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Vaginal group BiScience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. An Initial Survey on the Prevalence of Group BInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Group BThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roksana DarabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Sima TadiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mitra MohitDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Erfan SadeghiStudents Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Gita HatamizadehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Bahareh KardehStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mina Etminan-BakhshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Yekta ParsaYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroup B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of serious neonatal infections. Although great progress has been made in preventing prenatal GBS, its colonization rate in different regions of Iran remains unknown.

aimTo determine GBS colonization prevalence and its risk factors among Iranian pregnant women.

methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 186 pregnant women, who attended Boo-Ali hospital which is affiliated with Islamic Azad University in Tehran, Iran, from March 2014 to June 2015. The demographic, obstetric and gynecological data were gathered. A recto-vaginal culture was taken from each patient, with a sterile swab, in lithotomy position without using speculum, and vaginal pH was measured. Patients with positive GBS received IV antibiotic therapy during labor (penicillin G 3 gram at first dose then 1.5 gram Q/4h until delivery). Data were analyzed by statistical software SPSS version 21. Statistical tests for differences were performed by Chi-square test. Potential confounding was assessed by logistic regression. Level of significance was set at p<0.05.

resultsTwenty-two (11.8%) patients had positive recto-vaginal colonization. No significant differences between colonized and GBS-negative women with regard to age, obstetrics history and socio-economic factor were noticed. In contrast, smoking, history of previous infection with HPV, presence of vulvitis and a vaginal pH>4.5 were associated with GBS colonization (p≤0.05).

conclusionsWith a relatively low prevalence and few significantly correlated factors, it is hardly possible to define a high risk group of pregnant women for GBS colonization. Therefore, thorough measures should be taken in order to prevent infection complications in mothers and neonates in the Iranian population.

Indexed as

ColonizationGroup B StreptococcusPregnant WomenPrevalenceRisk FactorsVertical Infection Transmission

Identifiers

PMID28713513
PMCPMC5498706
OpenAlexW2695323678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.