ArticleAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2017
Analysis of Raw Biofluids by Mass Spectrometry Using Microfluidic Diffusion-Based Separation.
Article in Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Component Analysis of Protein- and DNA-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy with Interdigitated Electrode Sensors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microfluidic production of silver nanoparticles demonstrates ability for on demand synthesis of a wide size distribution of particles.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2024Article
- Design, Preparation and Performance Study of On-Chip Flow-Through Amperometric Sensors with an Integrated Ag/AgCl Reference Electrode.Micromachines · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Elucidation and monitoring of biomarkers continues to expand because of their medical value and potential to reduce healthcare costs. For example, biomarkers are used extensively to track physiology associated with drug addiction, disease progression, aging, and industrial processes. While longitudinal analyses are of great value from a biological or healthcare perspective, the cost associated with replicate analyses is preventing the expansion of frequent routine testing. Frequent testing could deepen our understanding of disease emergence and aid adoption of personalized healthcare. To address this need, we have developed a system for measuring metabolite abundance from raw biofluids. Using a metabolite extraction chip (MEC), based upon diffusive extraction of small molecules and metabolites from biofluids using microfluidics, we show that biologically relevant markers can be measured in blood and urine. Previously it was shown that the MEC could be used to track metabolic changes in real-time. We now demonstrate that the device can be adapted to high-throughput screening using standard liquid chromatography mass spectrometry instrumentation (LCMS). The results provide insight into the sensitivity of the system and its application for the analysis of human biofluids. Quantitative analysis of clinical predictors including nicotine, caffeine, and glutathione are described.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.