Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28713272›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2017

Anticancer Potential of

Santa Cirmi, Alessandro Maugeri, Nadia Ferlazzo, Sebastiano Gangemi, Gioacchino Calapai, Udo Schumacher, Michele Navarra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Anti-carcinogenic effects and mechanisms of actions ofAmerican journal of cancer research · 2024
    Article
  7. BioMed research international · 2024
    Article
  8. Tropical life sciences research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. An Insight intoPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Protective Role of an Extract Waste Product fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Santa CirmiDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
Alessandro MaugeriDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
Nadia FerlazzoDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
Sebastiano GangemiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy and Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems, National Research CouncilPozzuoli, Italy.
Gioacchino CalapaiDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
Udo SchumacherDepartment of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburg, Germany.
Michele NavarraDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of MessinaMessina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITInstitute for Scientific Interchange · ITInstitute of Applied Science and Intelligent Systems · ITUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

alternative medicinecancerCitrus juicehumansin vitroin vivoproliferationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28713272
PMCPMC5491624
OpenAlexW2731096445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.