ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2017
Population pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and its concentration-QT interval relationship modeling in Chinese healthy volunteers.
Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concentration-response modeling of ECG data from early-phase clinical studies to assess QT prolongation risk of contezolid (MRX-I), an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2019Trial
- Moxifloxacin concentration correlate with QTc interval in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients on shorter treatment regimens.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2022Article
- Moxifloxacin Pharmacokinetics, Cardiac Safety, and Dosing for the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in Children.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moxifloxacin (MX) is an 8-methoxyquinolone antimicrobial drug, which is often used as a positive control in thorough QT (TQT) studies. In the present study we established the population pharmacokinetics model of MX and the relationship of MX concentrations with the QT and various corrected QT (QTc) intervals, and compared the results with other ethnicities. The MX data used for modeling were obtained from a published TQT interval prolongation study of antofloxacin with MX as the positive control. In this four-period crossover study, 24 adult Chinese healthy volunteers received either 200 or 400 mg of oral antofloxacin once daily, 400 mg of MX, or a placebo. Population concentration-effect models were used to investigate the relationship between MX concentrations and QT interval prolongation, baseline-adjusted QTc (ΔQTc), or ΔQTc adjusted with time-matched placebo corrections (ΔΔQTc). The influencing factors of MX PK and the concentration-QTc relationship were determined through covariate screening. Simulation studies were conducted in R2.30 by using the final model with the estimated population mean and intra-individual and inter-individual variability. The estimated pharmacokinetic parameters and the estimated slope of the MX concentration-QT/ΔQTc/ΔΔQTc relationship were described using models and were compared to results for other ethnicities from the literature. We showed that the population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for total plasma clearance (CL/F), the volume of distribution of central compartment (Vc/F), the distributional clearance in plasma (Q), the volume of distribution of peripheral compartment (Vp/F), and the absorption rate constant (Ka) were 8.22 L/h, 104 L, 3.98 L/h, 37.7 L, and 1.81 1/h, respectively. There was no significant covariate included in the final model. QT interval prolongation of MX estimates ranging from 9.77 to 12.91 ms at the mean average maximum concentration of MX (4.36 μg/mL) and a mean slope ranging from 2.33 to 2.96 ms per μg/mL. In conclusion, no ethnic differences were observed for the MX pharmacokinetic parameters and QT interval prolongation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.