Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28712608›Full record

ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2017

A Custom-Developed Emergency Department Provider Electronic Documentation System Reduces Operational Efficiency.

Joshua Feblowitz, Sukhjit S Takhar, Michael J Ward, Ryan Ribeira, Adam B Landman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua FeblowitzHarvard Medical School and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Sukhjit S TakharHarvard Medical School and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Michael J WardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Ryan RibeiraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Adam B LandmanHarvard Medical School and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Information Systems, Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA. Electronic address: alandman@partners.org.

Funding

Enhancing Inter-Facility Transfer for Patients with Acute Myocardial InfarctionK23HL127130 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WARD, MICHAEL J. · 2016 to 2019
$642k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL127130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveElectronic health record implementation can improve care, but may also adversely affect emergency department (ED) efficiency. We examine how a custom, ED provider, electronic documentation system (eDoc), which replaced paper documentation, affects operational performance.

methodsWe analyzed retrospective operational data for 1-year periods before and after eDoc implementation in a single ED. We computed daily operational statistics, reflecting 60,870 pre- and 59,337 postimplementation patient encounters. The prespecified primary outcome was daily mean length of stay; secondary outcomes were daily mean length of stay for admitted and discharged patients and daily mean arrival time to disposition for admitted patients. We used a prespecified multiple regression model to identify differences in outcomes while controlling for prespecified confounding variables.

resultsThe unadjusted change in length of stay was 8.4 minutes; unadjusted changes in secondary outcomes were length of stay for admitted patients 11.4 minutes, length of stay for discharged patients 1.8 minutes, and time to disposition 1.8 minutes. With a prespecified regression analysis to control for variations in operational characteristics, there were significant increases in length of stay (6.3 minutes [95% confidence interval 3.5 to 9.1 minutes]) and length of stay for discharged patients (5.1 minutes [95% confidence interval 1.9 to 8.3 minutes]). There was no statistically significant change in length of stay for admitted patients or time to disposition.

conclusionIn our single-center study, the isolated implementation of eDoc was associated with increases in overall and discharge length of stay. Our findings suggest that a custom-designed electronic provider documentation may negatively affect ED throughput. Strategies to mitigate these effects, such as reducing documentation requirements or adding clinical staff, scribes, or voice recognition, would be a valuable area of future research.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28712608
PMCPMC5653416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.