Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28712359›Full record

ArticleTrials2017

Resource implications of preparing individual participant data from a clinical trial to share with external researchers.

Catrin Tudur Smith, Sarah Nevitt, Duncan Appelbe, Richard Appleton, Pete Dixon, Janet Harrison, Anthony Marson, Paula Williamson, Elizabeth Tremain

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05466955 (Slashing Two-wheeled Accidents by Leveraging Eyecare), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466955 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Slashing Two-wheeled Accidents by Leveraging Eyecare: a Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess Impact of Spectacles on Reducing Crash and Near-crash Events Among Myopic Motorcycle Drivers in Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2024 to 2027Enrolled158ConditionsMyopiaArmsFree eye glasses for un or under-corrected myopia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Individual participant data meta-analysis versus aggregate data meta-analysis: A case study in eczema and food allergy prevention.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catrin Tudur SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. cat1@liv.ac.uk.
Sarah NevittDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Duncan AppelbeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Richard AppletonAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Pete DixonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Janet HarrisonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Anthony MarsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Paula WilliamsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Block F, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Elizabeth TremainNational Institute for Health Research Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemands are increasingly being made for clinical trialists to actively share individual participant data (IPD) collected from clinical trials using responsible methods that protect the confidentiality and privacy of clinical trial participants. Clinical trialists, particularly those receiving public funding, are often concerned about the additional time and money that data-sharing activities will require, but few published empirical data are available to help inform these decisions. We sought to evaluate the activity and resources required to prepare anonymised IPD from a clinical trial in anticipation of a future data-sharing request.

methodsData from two UK publicly funded clinical trials were used for this exercise: 2437 participants with epilepsy recruited from 90 hospital outpatient clinics in the SANAD trial and 146 children with neuro-developmental problems recruited from 18 hospitals in the MENDS trial. We calculated the time and resources required to prepare each anonymised dataset and assemble a data pack ready for sharing.

resultsThe older SANAD trial (published 2007) required 50 hours of staff time with a total estimated associated cost of £3185 whilst the more recently completed MENDS trial (published 2012) required 39.5 hours of staff time with total estimated associated cost of £2540.

conclusionsClinical trial researchers, funders and sponsors should consider appropriate resourcing and allow reasonable time for preparing IPD ready for subsequent sharing. This process would be most efficient if prospectively built into the standard operational design and conduct of a clinical trial. Further empirical examples exploring the resource requirements in other settings is recommended.

trial registrationSANAD: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Registry: ISRCTN38354748 . Registered on 25 April 2003. MENDS: EU Clinical Trials Register Eudract 2006-004025-28 . Registered on 16 May 2007. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Registry: ISRCTN05534585 /MREC 07/MRE08/43. Registered on 26 January 2007.

Indexed as

Research DesignWorkflowClinical Trials as TopicData AnonymizationData CollectionEfficiency, OrganizationalHumansInformation DisseminationPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingResearch Support as TopicTime FactorsAnonymisationClinical trialCostData sharingIndividual participant dataIPDTransparency

Identifiers

PMID28712359
PMCPMC5512949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.