Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28712078›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Effects-based spatial assessment of contaminated estuarine sediments from Bear Creek, Baltimore Harbor, MD, USA.

Sharon E Hartzell, Michael A Unger, Beth L McGee, Sacoby M Wilson, Lance T Yonkos

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon E HartzellEnvironmental Science and Technology Department, University of Maryland, 1451 Animal Science Bldg, College Park, MD, 20742-2315, USA.
Michael A UngerVirginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, 1208 Greate Road, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA.
Beth L McGeeChesapeake Bay Foundation, Philip Merrill Environmental Center, 6 Herndon Avenue, Annapolis, MD, 21403, USA.
Sacoby M Wilson
Lance T YonkosEnvironmental Science and Technology Department, University of Maryland, 1451 Animal Science Bldg, College Park, MD, 20742-2315, USA. lyonkos@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-7890
University of Maryland, College Park · USChesapeake Bay Foundation · USWilliam & Mary · US

Funding

Impact of Groundwater-Surface Water Dynamics on in situ Remediation Efficacy andR01ES024245 · NIEHS · VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE · PI BECK, AARON, UNGER, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2019
$850k
Chesapeake Bay Foundation no award numberNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US) - Superfund Research Program RO1ES024245NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estuarine sediments in regions with prolonged histories of industrial activity are often laden to significant depths with complex contaminant mixtures, including trace metals and persistent organic pollutants. Given the complexity of assessing risks from multi-contaminant exposures, the direct measurement of impacts to biological receptors is central to characterizing contaminated sediment sites. Though biological consequences are less commonly assessed at depth, laboratory-based toxicity testing of subsurface sediments can be used to delineate the scope of contamination at impacted sites. The extent and depth of sediment toxicity in Bear Creek, near Baltimore, Maryland, USA, was delineated using 10-day acute toxicity tests with the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus, and chemical analysis of trace metals and persistent organic pollutants. A gradient of toxicity was demonstrated in surface sediments with 21 of 22 tested sites differing significantly from controls. Effects were most pronounced (100% lethality) at sites proximate to a historic industrial complex. Sediments from eight of nine core samples to depths of 80 cm were particularly impacted (i.e., caused significant lethality to L. plumulosus) even in locations overlain with relatively non-toxic surface sediments, supporting a conclusion that toxicity observed at the surface (top 2 cm) does not adequately predict toxicity at depth. In seven of nine sites, toxicity of surface sediments differed from toxicity at levels beneath by 28 to 69%, in five instances underestimating toxicity (28 to 69%), and in two instances overestimating toxicity (44 to 56%). Multiple contaminants exceeded sediment quality guidelines and correlated positively with toxic responses within surface sediments (e.g., chromium, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), total petroleum hydrocarbon). Use of an antibody-based PAH biosensor revealed that porewater PAH concentrations also increased with depth at most sites. This study informs future management decisions concerning the extent of impact to Bear Creek sediments, and demonstrates the benefits of a spatial approach, relying primarily on toxicity testing to assess sediment quality in a system with complex contaminant mixtures.

Indexed as

EstuariesAmphipodaAnimalsBaltimoreEnvironmental MonitoringGeologic SedimentsRiversToxicity TestsWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, ChemicalLeptocheirus plumulosusPersistent organic pollutantsPore waterSediment chemistrySediment toxicityTrace metals

Identifiers

PMID28712078
PMCPMC5693697
OpenAlexW2735406094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.