ArticleLa Radiologia medica2017
Clinical role of guidance by C-arm CT for
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Radiation Exposure and Influential Factors in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of the Head and Abdomen during Interventional Procedures.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Simultaneous percutaneous microwave ablation and biopsy for highly suspected malignant pulmonary nodules: a retrospective cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Percutaneous microwave ablation for lung tumors: a retrospective case-control study of conventional CT and C-arm CT guidance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Celiac plexus block combined withAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Brachytherapy Drainage Catheter and Chemotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma Combined with Obstructive Jaundice.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy: Recent Advances in Optimization of Radiobiological Cancer Therapy.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the clinical value of C-arm CT (CACT)-guided interstitial iodine-125 ( MATERIALS AND
methods30 patients with 40 solid pulmonary tumors were enrolled to undergo CACT-guided interstitial
resultsThe technical success of interstitial
conclusionCACT can provide virtual navigation and real-time fluoroscopy synchronously for interstitial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.