Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28712052›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2017

Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder.

Paweł Kroll

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neurogenic Bladder in Children with Myelomeningocele.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Perspectives on urological care in spina bifida patients.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Medical Management of Neurogenic Bladder for Children and Adults: A Review.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2019
    Review
  14. Bioengineering Approaches for Bladder Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paweł KrollNeuro-urology Unit, Pediatric Surgery and Urology Clinic, Ul. Pamiątkowa 2/42, 61-512, Poznań, Poland. pawelkroll.poczta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-5477
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurogenic bladder (NB) is a nonspecific term that may describe conditions ranging from areflectic noncontractile bladder to detrusor overactivity. The most common cause of NB in children is the presence of dysraphic malformations. Urodynamic evaluations make it possible to describe bladder dysfunctions and to plan a therapeutic strategy for each patient. In a child with NB there are two major dangerous functional problems seen in urodynamic investigations: high intravesical pressure in the storage phase and high pressure during urination. The basic goals of urologic treatment for a child with NB are the protection of the urinary tract from complications and improvement of continence. Treatment for a child with NB is usually conservative, and focuses on achieving safe bladder pressures during storage with reliable emptying, via voiding or catheterization. The two most important forms of conservative treatment are clean intermittent catheterization and pharmacological treatment of functional disorders. Some drugs are used in the treatment of functional disorders in children with NB, but none of the drugs are officially approved for small children and babies.

Indexed as

ChildHumansRisk FactorsUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID28712052
PMCPMC5605603
OpenAlexW2735028158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.