Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28712046›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2017

The Healthy Worker Survivor Effect: Target Parameters and Target Populations.

Daniel M Brown, Sally Picciotto, Sadie Costello, Andreas M Neophytou, Monika A Izano, Jacqueline M Ferguson, Ellen A Eisen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Work-related stress among sworn and non-sworn law enforcement personnel.International journal of police science & management · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel M BrownDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Sally PicciottoDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Sadie CostelloDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Andreas M NeophytouDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Monika A IzanoDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jacqueline M FergusonDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ellen A EisenDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. eeisen@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Targeted Research Training CoreT42OH008429 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARRIS ADAMSON, CARISA · 2005 to 2024
$30.0M
Disease, Disability and Death in an Aging WorkforceR56AG026291 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LINDA, CULLEN, MARK RICHARD · 2016 to 2016
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R56 AG026291NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe offer an in-depth discussion of the time-varying confounding and selection bias mechanisms that give rise to the healthy worker survivor effect (HWSE). RECENT

findingsIn this update of an earlier review, we distinguish between the mechanisms collectively known as the HWSE and the statistical bias that can result. This discussion highlights the importance of identifying both the target parameter and the target population for any research question in occupational epidemiology. Target parameters can correspond to hypothetical workplace interventions; we explore whether these target parameters' true values reflect the etiologic effect of an exposure on an outcome or the potential impact of enforcing an exposure limit in a more realistic setting. If a cohort includes workers hired before the start of follow-up, HWSE mechanisms can limit the transportability of the estimates to other target populations. We summarize recent publications that applied g-methods to control for the HWSE, focusing on their target parameters, target populations, and hypothetical interventions.

Indexed as

Healthy Worker EffectSurvivorsBiasHumansOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureSelection BiasG-methodsHealthy worker survivor biasOccupational epidemiologySelection biasTime-varying confounding

Identifiers

PMID28712046
PMCPMC5693751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.