Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28712025›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Side-to-side asymmetries in landing mechanics from a drop vertical jump test are not related to asymmetries in knee joint laxity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Christophe A G Meyer, Paul Gette, Caroline Mouton, Romain Seil, Daniel Theisen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Increases in Joint Laxity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Associated With Sagittal Biomechanical Asymmetry.Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe A G MeyerSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 76, Rue d'Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Paul GetteSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 76, Rue d'Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Caroline MoutonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg - Clinique d'Eich, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Romain SeilSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 76, Rue d'Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Daniel TheisenSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 76, Rue d'Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. daniel.theisen@lih.lu.
Luxembourg Institute of Health · LUCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAsymmetries in knee joint biomechanics and increased knee joint laxity in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are considered risk factors for re-tear or early onset of osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, the relationship between these factors has not been established. The aim of the study was to compare knee mechanics during landing from a bilateral drop vertical jump in patients following ACLR and control participants and to study the relationship between side-to-side asymmetries in landing mechanics and knee joint laxity.

methodsSeventeen patients following ACLR were evaluated and compared to 28 healthy controls. Knee sagittal and frontal plane kinematics and kinetics were evaluated using three-dimensional motion capture (200 Hz) and two synchronized force platforms (1000 Hz). Static anterior and internal rotation knee laxities were measured for both groups and legs using dedicated arthrometers. Group and leg differences were investigated using a mixed model analysis of variance. The relationship between side-to-side differences in sagittal knee power/energy absorption and knee joint laxities was evaluated using univariate linear regression.

resultsA significant group-by-leg interaction (p = 0.010) was found for knee sagittal plane energy absorption, with patients having 25% lower values in their involved compared to their non-involved leg (1.22 ± 0.39 vs. 1.62 ± 0.40 J kg

conclusionsNine months following surgery, ACLR patients were shown to employ a knee unloading strategy of their involved leg during bilateral landing. However, this strategy was unrelated to their increased anterior knee laxity. Side-to-side asymmetries during simple bilateral landing tasks may put ACLR patients at increased risk of second ACL injury or early-onset osteoarthritis development. Detecting and correcting asymmetric landing strategies is highly relevant in the framework of personalized rehabilitation, which calls for complex biomechanical analyses to be applied in clinical routine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKnee JointMaleMovementPostoperative ComplicationsRotationYoung AdultAsymmetrical knee loadingKnee injuryKnee kinematicsKnee kineticsRotational knee laxityStatic anterior laxity

Identifiers

PMID28712025
PMCPMC5794826
OpenAlexW2734908995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.