ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018
Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Enhancing fall risk assessment: instrumenting vision with deep learning during walks.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Feasibility of self-reported health related quality of life assessment with older people in residential care: insights from the application of eye tracking technology.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Factors affecting inter-rater agreement in human classification of eye movements: a comparison of three datasets.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Sports related concussion: an emerging era in digital sports technology.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Review
- Gaze aversion in conversational settings: An investigation based on mock job interview.Journal of eye movement research · 2021Article
- Wearables in rugby union: A protocol for multimodal digital sports-related concussion assessment.PloS one · 2021Article
- Experiential Knowledge Affects the Visual Search Behaviors of Sprint Coaches and Sport Biomechanists.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020Article
- MAGiC: A Multimodal Framework for Analysing Gaze in Dyadic Communication.Journal of eye movement research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mobile eye-trackers are currently used during real-world tasks (e.g. gait) to monitor visual and cognitive processes, particularly in ageing and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, contextual analysis involving fixation locations during such tasks is rarely performed due to its complexity. This study adapted a validated algorithm and developed a classification method to semi-automate contextual analysis of mobile eye-tracking data. We further assessed inter-rater reliability of the proposed classification method. A mobile eye-tracker recorded eye-movements during walking in five healthy older adult controls (HC) and five people with PD. Fixations were identified using a previously validated algorithm, which was adapted to provide still images of fixation locations (n = 116). The fixation location was manually identified by two raters (DH, JN), who classified the locations. Cohen's kappa correlation coefficients determined the inter-rater reliability. The algorithm successfully provided still images for each fixation, allowing manual contextual analysis to be performed. The inter-rater reliability for classifying the fixation location was high for both PD (kappa = 0.80, 95% agreement) and HC groups (kappa = 0.80, 91% agreement), which indicated a reliable classification method. This study developed a reliable semi-automated contextual analysis method for gait studies in HC and PD. Future studies could adapt this methodology for various gait-related eye-tracking studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.