ArticlePediatric cardiology2017
Efficacy of an Extracellular Matrix in Systemic Loading Conditions in Congenital Heart Surgery.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular matrices (ECM) are commonly used to repair congenital heart defects; however, there is a lack of literature pertaining to outcomes with ECM use in high-pressure conditions. Between 2011 and 2014, a total of 202 patients underwent congenital heart disease repair using the ECM placed in a systemic pressure condition. The operative sites included: defects in the ventricular septum, mitral valve, aortic valve, ascending aorta, and aortic arch. Patients were followed and evaluated for mortality and reoperations due to loss of ECM integrity. Echocardiograms were evaluated for graft malfunction such as aneurysmal dilation, VSD formation, valve malfunction, or outflow tract obstruction. Patients were followed for an average of 1492 days (Median = 1583). Out of the 202 patients, 7 (3.5%) died due to complications unrelated to ECM, and 10 (5%) underwent reoperations due to complications of ECM integrity. Reoperations were as follows: two of 6 patients receiving aortic leaflet replacement required reoperation for leaflet failure; four of 12 patients receiving mitral valve leaflet repairs required reoperation for leaflet failure; and four of 142 patients with VSD repair required reoperation for residual shunting. The average time to reoperation was 208 days. There were no outflow tract obstructions or aneurysmal dilatations observed. This modern case series suggests that the ECM is efficacious and sustainable under systemic conditions in congenital heart defect repair. However, concerns remain about the use of ECM in aortic valve repair and infant mitral valve repair. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term ECM integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28711965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.