Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28711584›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage2017

Biomarkers reflect differences in osteoarthritis phenotypes of the lumbar spine: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

A P Goode, A E Nelson, V B Kraus, J B Renner, J M Jordan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A P GoodeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: adam.goode@duke.edu.
A E NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
V B KrausDuke Molecular Physiology Institute and Division of Rheumatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
J B RennerThurston Arthritis Research Center, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
J M JordanDepartment of Medicine, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · US

Funding

Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Virginia B Kraus · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
Project 3P60AR049465 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JORDAN, JOANNE M. · 2003 to 2008
$6.0M
Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project: Arthritis, Disability, and Other Chronic DiseasesU01DP006266 · DP · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NELSON, AMANDA E · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
Women's knee motion patterns in functional activitiesP60AR030701 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CALLAHAN, LEIGH FLEMING · 1986 to 2001
$1.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006266NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR057661NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR030701NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR049465NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine differences in biomarker levels between radiographic phenotypes of facet joint osteoarthritis (FOA) only, spine OA only ((disc space narrowing (DSN) and vertebral osteophytes (OST)) or the combination of FOA and spine OA.

designA cross-sectional analysis of data from 555 participants in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project was performed. Lumbar spine levels were graded by severity (OST and DSN) and presence (FOA) of degeneration. Biomarkers included hyaluronan (HA) and type II collagen (CTX-II). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRR) were estimated using multinomial regression, with adjustment for age, race, sex, body mass index (BMI), and radiographic OA (knee, hip, hand). Interactions were tested between sex, race and low back symptoms.

resultsFOA only was present in 22.4%, 14.5% had spine OA only, and 34.6% had the combination of FOA and spine OA. Compared to the reference group of neither FOA or spine OA, a one unit higher ln HA level was associated with 31% higher relative risk ratio (RRR = 1.31 (95% 1.03, 1.67)) of having FOA only, while, a one unit higher lnuCTX-II level was associated with 84% higher relative risk ratio (RRR = 1.84 (95% CI 1.19, 2.84)) of having spine OA only. No significant interactions were identified.

conclusionInterestingly, OA affecting the synovial facet joint was associated with a marker of inflammation (HA). Spine OA, affecting intervertebral discs that contain collagen type II, was associated with a marker reflecting collagen type II degradation (CTX-II). These findings suggest that biomarkers may reflect the different pathophysiologic processes of lumbar spine OA phenotypes.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeAgedBiomarkersCollagen Type IICross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, SpineOsteophytePhenotypeRadiographyZygapophyseal JointBiomarkersCollagen Type IIBiomarkersLumbar spineOsteoarthritisPhenotypes

Identifiers

PMID28711584
PMCPMC5605465
OpenAlexW2736147008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.