ArticleJournal of medical virology2018
Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A Comparison of Methods for Modeling Multistate Cancer Progression Using Screening Data with Censoring after Intervention.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- The role and diagnostic value of deregulated miRNAs in cervical cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Supporting the global reduction of cervical cancer: challenges in colposcopy practice and training.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Herpes Simplex Virus, Human Papillomavirus, and Cervical Cancer: Overview, Relationship, and Treatment Implications.Cancers · 2023Review
- Could HPV Type 33 Be More Risky Than We Thought?International journal of surgical pathology · 2023Article
- Correlation analysis of vaginal microecology and different types of human papillomavirus infection: a study conducted at a hospital in northwest China.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Diagnosis Value of Colposcope Combined with Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen, Carbohydrate Antigen 125, and Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Moderate to Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Modified Fuzheng Peiyuan Decoction.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China.Journal of medical virology · 2018Article
- The Infection Status and Distribution of hrHPV in Cervical Lesions Among Overweight Women Referred for Colposcopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of Human papillomavirus16/18 infection referral to colposcopy in cervical cancer screening for women aged 25 years and older in Chinese northwest region Shaan'xi province. A total of 2224 women were diagnosed with primary high-risk HPV infection by HPV-DNA genotyping technology during August 2014 to August 2015. A total of 1916 cases referred for colposcopy with histological evidence were enrolled, including 1124 women with HPV16/18 genotype and 792 with other High-risk human papillomavirus genotypes. A total of 1916 women aged 25 years and older with HR-HPV positive were referred to colposcopy. The distribution of HPV16, HPV18, and other HR-HPVs infection were 49.22%, 9.45%, and 41.33%, respectively. 71.56% had normal cervical histology, 7.05% had Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia1, 8.82% had CIN2, 7.25% had CIN3, and 5.32% had cervical cancer. The percentage of positivity of HPV16 and HPV18 was highly associated with the relative risk of cervical lesion. The sensitivity and specificity of HPV16/18 for detection of CIN2+ (CIN3+) was 82.68% (92.12%) and 47.87% (46.15%), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of HPV16/18 for detection of CIN2+ (CIN3+) was 30.16% (19.75%) and 91.03% (97.60%), respectively. HPV16 and HVP18 are the most common genotypes in high grade cervical lesions in Shaan'xi province. Meanwhile, these two types play predominant roles in the progression of high grade cervical lesion. Primary HPV16/18 detection has high sensitivity and negative predictive value in cervical cancer screening and the strategy for women with HPV16 and HPV18 infection referral to colposcopy is efficient and feasible in northwestern region of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.