Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710724›Full record

ArticlePituitary2017

Best candidates for dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas.

Myoung Jin Ji, Jung Hee Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Jung Hyun Lee, Yong Hwy Kim, Sun Ha Paek, Chan Soo Shin, Seong Yeon Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reframing the Paradigm: A Nuanced Approach to Prolactinoma Management.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: A single-institute experience.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Myoung Jin JiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hee KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. jhkxingfu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1932-0234
Ji Hyun LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hyun LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong Hwy KimPituitary Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun Ha PaekPituitary Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chan Soo ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seong Yeon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDopamine agonist (DA) therapy is recommended as the first-line treatment for prolactinomas. However, it requires long treatment duration, and a high recurrence rate after DA withdrawal has been reported. We aimed to elucidate the predictors for long-term remission following DA withdrawal and propose the best candidates who can achieve complete remission after DA withdrawal.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort study, we included 89 patients with prolactinoma who have withdrawn DAs with normal prolactin (PRL) levels at Seoul National University Hospital, from 2000 to 2016. Patient's data were retrieved from the electronic medical records.

resultsThe median age and median treatment duration of the study patients were 33 (15-73) years and 69.5 (8.3-277.4) months, respectively. The recurrence rate after drug withdrawal was 57.3% during the 23.9 (3.0-176.8) month follow-up period. Age, gender, baseline PRL level, and baseline maximum tumor diameter were similar between the remission and recurrence group. In the Cox-proportional hazard model analysis, the significant predictors for remission were nadir PRL level of <1 ng/dL (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.37 [0.18-0.74]), invisible tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.42 [0.24-0.74]), and treatment duration of >72 months (0.54 [0.30-0.96]). Of the subjects who met all the three criteria, 66.7% achieved long-term remission.

conclusionsPatients who have no tumor visible on MRI, have a nadir PRL level <1 ng/dL during drug treatment, and received drug treatment for >6 years may be the best candidates for DA withdrawal.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBromocriptineCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProlactinomaRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBromocriptineCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesBromocriptineCabergolineDopamine agonistsDrug withdrawalProlactinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.