Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710685›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2017

Pericytes Extend Survival of ALS SOD1 Mice and Induce the Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes in the Murine Model and in IPSCs Derived Neuronal Cells from an ALS Patient.

Giuliana Castello Coatti, Miriam Frangini, Marcos C Valadares, Juliana Plat Gomes, Natalia O Lima, Natale Cavaçana, Amanda F Assoni, Mayra V Pelatti, Alexander Birbrair, Antonio Carlos Pedroso de Lima and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pericytes in the optic nerve head.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction and myelin basic protein in survival of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with or without frontotemporal dementia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Glioma Pericytes Promote Angiogenesis by Producing Periostin.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Basal lamina changes in neurodegenerative disorders.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2021
    Review
  12. Sensory nerves in the spotlight of the stem cell niche.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. From in vitro to in vivo reprogramming for neural transdifferentiation: An approach for CNS tissue remodeling using stem cell technology.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Neural stem cell niche heterogeneity.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  18. Staphylococcus epidermidis role in the skin microenvironment.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Pericyte Plasticity in the Brain.Neuroscience bulletin · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuliana Castello CoattiHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Miriam FranginiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marcos C ValadaresHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Juliana Plat GomesHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Natalia O LimaHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Natale CavaçanaHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Amanda F AssoniHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Mayra V PelattiHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Alexander BirbrairDepartment of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Antonio Carlos Pedroso de LimaDepartment of Statistics, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Julio M SingerDepartment of Statistics, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Francisco Marcelo M RochaDepartment of Statistics, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Giovani Loiola Da SilvaDepartment of Statistics, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mario Sergio MantovaniDepartament of Biology, University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Lucia Inês Macedo-SouzaHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Merari F R FerrariHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil.
Mayana ZatzHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Rua do Matāo 106, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-030, Brazil. mayazatz@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is one of the most common adult-onset motor neuron disease causing a progressive, rapid and irreversible degeneration of motor neurons in the cortex, brain stem and spinal cord. No effective treatment is available and cell therapy clinical trials are currently being tested in ALS affected patients. It is well known that in ALS patients, approximately 50% of pericytes from the spinal cord barrier are lost. In the central nervous system, pericytes act in the formation and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier, a natural defense that slows the progression of symptoms in neurodegenerative diseases. Here we evaluated, for the first time, the therapeutic effect of human pericytes in vivo in SOD1 mice and in vitro in motor neurons and other neuronal cells derived from one ALS patient. Pericytes and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were derived from the same adipose tissue sample and were administered to SOD1 mice intraperitoneally. The effect of the two treatments was compared. Treatment with pericytes extended significantly animals survival in SOD1 males, but not in females that usually have a milder phenotype with higher survival rates. No significant differences were observed in the survival of mice treated with MSCs. Gene expression analysis in brain and spinal cord of end-stage animals showed that treatment with pericytes can stimulate the host antioxidant system. Additionally, pericytes induced the expression of SOD1 and CAT in motor neurons and other neuronal cells derived from one ALS patient carrying a mutation in FUS. Overall, treatment with pericytes was more effective than treatment with MSCs. Our results encourage further investigations and suggest that pericytes may be a good option for ALS treatment in the future. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain StemCatalaseCerebral CortexDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGene ExpressionHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, TransgenicCatalaseFUS protein, humanRNA-Binding Protein FUSSod1 protein, mouseSuperoxide Dismutase-1Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisIPSCsMesenchymal stromal cellsMotor neuronsPericytesSOD1 mice

Identifiers

PMID28710685
OpenAlexW2734859442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.