ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2017
Intoxication caused by new psychostimulants: analytical methods to disclose acute and chronic use of benzofurans and ethylphenidate.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toxicological investigations in a death involving 2-MAPB.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2021Article
- Methiopropamine and its acute behavioral effects in mice: is there a gray zone in new psychoactive substances users?International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Syntheses and analytical characterizations of novel (2-aminopropyl)benzo[b]thiophene (APBT) based stimulants.Drug testing and analysis · 2020Article
- Emerging club drugs: 5-(2-aminopropyl)benzofuran (5-APB) is more toxic than its isomer 6-(2-aminopropyl)benzofuran (6-APB) in hepatocyte cellular models.Archives of toxicology · 2020Article
- The Psychonauts' World of Cognitive Enhancers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- New Psychoactive Substances: A Matter of Time.Current neuropharmacology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acute and chronic toxicity of several new psychoactive substances (NPS) is unknown, and only little information is available on the pharmacology and toxicology, toxicokinetics, and detectability in body samples of such new compounds. We here propose analytical methods to disclose acute and chronic use of two types of new psychostimulants: benzofurans and ethylphenidate and we applied them to a real case of a subject attending Emergency Department with signs of acute intoxication due to psychotropic drug(s). After a urinary immunoassay screening which gave a positivity to amphetamines, general unknown gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) urine analysis identified 5-(2-methylaminopropyl)benzofuran (5-MAPB), 5-(2-aminopropyl)benzofuran (5-APB), 5-(2-ethylaminopropyl)benzofuran (5-EAPB), ethylphenidate, and ritalinic acid. All these substances were confirmed and quantified not only in urine but also in serum samples at different times after hospitalization by GC-MS and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Two subsequent 2-cm hair segments were also analyzed and tested positive for the above reported substances, evidencing repeated use. The matching quantitative results in all the analyzed biological matrices demonstrated that both analytical methodologies were suitable to correctly quantify NPS involved in the current intoxication. The objective assessment of acute and chronic intoxication by the above reported compounds demonstrate that the development of analytical methods aiming at the detection of a broad spectrum of compounds in conventional and non-conventional biological matrices is helpful when facing the new challenging threat of intoxications caused by NPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.