ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2017
Employers' experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06994182 (Perspectives of Italian Employers Regarding the Return to Work Process of Employees Who Received a Cancer Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Perspectives of Italian Employers Regarding the Return to Work Process of Employees Who Received a Cancer Diagnosis: a Qualitative Study
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- The experiences and perceptions of employers on cancer survivors returning to work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- A randomised feasibility trial of an employer-based intervention for enhancing successful return to work of cancer survivors (MiLES intervention).BMC public health · 2021Trial
- Return to work experience on structural constraints and gendered differences among nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- A scoping review on information and support needs regarding cancer and work: part II-needs of employers and professionals in supporting cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Returning to work is not enough for cancer survivors: vocational rehabilitation needs to consider work-related well-being.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Work-related experiences and unmet needs of patients with a malignant glioma and relevant professionals: the BrainWork study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Disclosing the 'Big C': what does cancer survivorship signal to employers?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Line Managers' Perspectives and Responses when Employees Burn Out.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Breast Cancer Survivors' Experiences of Managers' Actions During the Return to Work Process: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Patient and caregiver return to work after a primary brain tumor.Neuro-oncology practice · 2023Article
- Tailored support for preparing employees with cancer to return to work: Recognition and gaining new insights in an open atmosphere.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Adaptation of the Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Consensus-Based Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Transitional self-disappear: the journey of cancer survivors to self re-coherence in a Middle East society.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Exploring Employer Perspectives on Their Supportive Role in Accommodating Workers with Disabilities to Promote Sustainable RTW: A Qualitative Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Workplace health surveillance and COVID-19: algorithmic health discrimination and cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
- Enhancing Emotional Skills of Managers to Support the Return to Work of Cancer Survivors: A Research Opinion Focusing on Value, Feasibility and Challenges.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Working after cancer: in-depth perspectives from a setting with limited employment protection policies.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- Late effects of cancer (treatment) and work ability: guidance by managers and professionals.BMC public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRemaining in paid work is of great importance for cancer survivors, and employers play a crucial role in achieving this. Return to work (RTW) is best seen as a process. This study aims to provide insight into (1) Dutch employers' experiences with RTW of employees with cancer and (2) the employers' needs for support regarding this process.
methodsThirty employer representatives of medium and large for-profit and non-profit organizations were interviewed to investigate their experiences and needs in relation to employees with cancer. A Grounded Theory approach was used.
resultsWe revealed a trajectory of complex communication and decision-making during different stages, from the moment the employee disclosed that they had been diagnosed to the period after RTW, permanent disability, or the employee's passing away. Employers found this process demanding due to various dilemmas. Dealing with an unfavorable diagnosis and balancing both the employer's and the employee's interests were found to be challenging. Two types of approach to support RTW of employees with cancer were distinguished: (1) a business-oriented approach and (2) a care-oriented approach. Differences in approach were related to differences in organizational structure and employer and employee characteristics. Employers expressed a need for communication skills, information, and decision-making skills to support employees with cancer.
conclusionsThe employers interviewed stated that dealing with an employee with cancer is demanding and that the extensive Dutch legislation on RTW did not offer all the support needed. We recommend providing them with easily accessible information on communication and leadership training to better support employees with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: • Supporting employers by training communication and decision-making skills and providing information on cancer will contribute to improving RTW support for employees with cancer. • Knowing that the employer will usually be empathic when an employee reveals that they have been diagnosed with cancer, and that the employer also experiences difficulties and dilemmas, might lower the threshold to discuss wishes regarding disclosure, communication, and work issues. • The interests of employer and employee in relation to RTW are interrelated; both have responsibility and a role to play, and are in need of support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.