Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710544›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2017

Employers' experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication.

C M Tiedtke, B Dierckx de Casterlé, M H W Frings-Dresen, A G E M De Boer, M A Greidanus, S J Tamminga, A E De Rijk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06994182 (Perspectives of Italian Employers Regarding the Return to Work Process of Employees Who Received a Cancer Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06994182 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Perspectives of Italian Employers Regarding the Return to Work Process of Employees Who Received a Cancer Diagnosis: a Qualitative Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsCancer Survivors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The experiences and perceptions of employers on cancer survivors returning to work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Return to work experience on structural constraints and gendered differences among nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Disclosing the 'Big C': what does cancer survivorship signal to employers?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  9. Line Managers' Perspectives and Responses when Employees Burn Out.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transitional self-disappear: the journey of cancer survivors to self re-coherence in a Middle East society.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C M TiedtkeDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. c.tiedtke@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
B Dierckx de CasterléDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
M H W Frings-DresenAcademic Medical Center, Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A G E M De BoerAcademic Medical Center, Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A GreidanusAcademic Medical Center, Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S J TammingaAcademic Medical Center, Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A E De RijkDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLKU Leuven · BE

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding grant number UVA 2014-7153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRemaining in paid work is of great importance for cancer survivors, and employers play a crucial role in achieving this. Return to work (RTW) is best seen as a process. This study aims to provide insight into (1) Dutch employers' experiences with RTW of employees with cancer and (2) the employers' needs for support regarding this process.

methodsThirty employer representatives of medium and large for-profit and non-profit organizations were interviewed to investigate their experiences and needs in relation to employees with cancer. A Grounded Theory approach was used.

resultsWe revealed a trajectory of complex communication and decision-making during different stages, from the moment the employee disclosed that they had been diagnosed to the period after RTW, permanent disability, or the employee's passing away. Employers found this process demanding due to various dilemmas. Dealing with an unfavorable diagnosis and balancing both the employer's and the employee's interests were found to be challenging. Two types of approach to support RTW of employees with cancer were distinguished: (1) a business-oriented approach and (2) a care-oriented approach. Differences in approach were related to differences in organizational structure and employer and employee characteristics. Employers expressed a need for communication skills, information, and decision-making skills to support employees with cancer.

conclusionsThe employers interviewed stated that dealing with an employee with cancer is demanding and that the extensive Dutch legislation on RTW did not offer all the support needed. We recommend providing them with easily accessible information on communication and leadership training to better support employees with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: • Supporting employers by training communication and decision-making skills and providing information on cancer will contribute to improving RTW support for employees with cancer. • Knowing that the employer will usually be empathic when an employee reveals that they have been diagnosed with cancer, and that the employer also experiences difficulties and dilemmas, might lower the threshold to discuss wishes regarding disclosure, communication, and work issues. • The interests of employer and employee in relation to RTW are interrelated; both have responsibility and a role to play, and are in need of support.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmploymentFemaleHumansNeoplasmsOccupational HealthReturn to WorkSurvivorsCancerCommunicationEmployer perspectiveQualitativeReturn to workWorkplace support

Identifiers

PMID28710544
PMCPMC5602070
OpenAlexW2736011586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.