Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The CINSARC signature as a prognostic marker for clinical outcome in multiple neoplasms.

Tom Lesluyes, Lucile Delespaul, Jean-Michel Coindre, Frédéric Chibon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CINSARC signature outperforms gold-standard TNM staging and consensus molecular subtypes for clinical outcome in stage II-III colorectal carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tom LesluyesINSERM U1218, Institut Bergonié, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. t.lesluyes@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.
Lucile DelespaulINSERM U1218, Institut Bergonié, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Michel CoindreUniversity of Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Frédéric ChibonINSERM U1218, Institut Bergonié, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. f.chibon@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported the CINSARC signature as a prognostic marker for metastatic events in soft tissue sarcomas, breast carcinomas and lymphomas through genomic instability, acting as a major factor for tumor aggressiveness. In this study, we used a published resource to investigate CINSARC enrichment in poor outcome-associated genes at pan-cancer level and in 39 cancer types. CINSARC outperformed more than 15,000 defined signatures (including cancer-related), being enriched in top-ranked poor outcome-associated genes of 21 cancer types, widest coverage reached among all tested signatures. Independently, this signature demonstrated significant survival differences between risk-groups in 33 published studies, representing 17 tumor types. As a consequence, we propose the CINSARC prognostication as a general marker for tumor aggressiveness to optimize the clinical managements of patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28710396
PMCPMC5511191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.