ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2017
Priorities for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Centers for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Working Group.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors of health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Pooled it
- Introduction to Mammalian Genome special issue: cardiovascular disease in the Mammalian Genome.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023Article
- Conceptual Framework for Personal Recovery in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Inflection Point: Ideas for Accelerating Breakthroughs and Improving Cardiovascular Health.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Article
- Race-based and sex-based differences in bioactive lipid mediators after myocardial infarction.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- Clinical value of non-coding RNAs in cardiovascular, pulmonary, and muscle diseases.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Centers for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (CCORs) held a meeting to review how cardiovascular outcomes research had evolved in the decade since the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 2004 working group report and to consider future directions. The conference involved representatives from governmental agencies, outcomes research thought leaders, and public and private healthcare partners. The main purposes of this meeting were to (1) advance collaborative high-yield, high-impact outcomes research; (2) identify priorities and barriers to important cardiovascular outcomes research; and (3) define future needs for the field. This report highlights the key topics covered during the meeting, including an examination of the recent history of outcomes research, an evaluation of the current academic climate, and a vision for the future of cardiovascular outcomes research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.