Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710260›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2018

Big Bang Tumor Growth and Clonal Evolution.

Ruping Sun, Zheng Hu, Christina Curtis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Colorectal Cancer Cell Biology and Clonal Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruping SunDepartments of Medicine and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.
Zheng HuDepartments of Medicine and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.
Christina CurtisDepartments of Medicine and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.

Funding

Integrated genomic analysis and multi-scale modeling of therapeutic resistanceR01CA182514 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CHRISTINA N · 2014 to 2018
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent and application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies to tumor genomes has reinvigorated efforts to understand clonal evolution. Although tumor progression has traditionally been viewed as a gradual stepwise process, recent studies suggest that evolutionary rates in tumors can be variable with periods of punctuated mutational bursts and relative stasis. For example, Big Bang dynamics have been reported, wherein after transformation, growth occurs in the absence of stringent selection, consistent with effectively neutral evolution. Although first noted in colorectal tumors, effective neutrality may be relatively common. Additionally, punctuated evolution resulting from mutational bursts and cataclysmic genomic alterations have been described. In this review, we contrast these findings with the conventional gradualist view of clonal evolution and describe potential clinical and therapeutic implications of different evolutionary modes and tempos.

Indexed as

Clonal EvolutionCell ProliferationHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28710260
PMCPMC5932575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.