Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710227›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics (A-CAP): a prospective, concurrent cohort, longitudinal study of mild traumatic brain injury in children: protocol study.

Keith Owen Yeates, Miriam Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Roger Zemek, Bruce Bjornson, Jocelyn Gravel, Angelo Mikrogianakis, Bradley Goodyear, Nishard Abdeen and 17 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Harmonization of multi-scannerFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Keith Owen YeatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-2892
Miriam BeauchampDepartment of Psychology, Universite de Montreal and Ste Justine Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
William CraigDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta and Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Quynh DoanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia and BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Roger ZemekDepartment of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Bruce BjornsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia and BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jocelyn GravelDepartment of Pediatrics, Universite de Montreal and Ste Justine Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Angelo MikrogianakisAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bradley GoodyearHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nishard AbdeenDepartment of Radiology, University of Ottawa and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Christian BeaulieuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mathieu DehaesDepartment of Radiology, Radiooncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal and Ste Justine Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sylvain DeschenesDepartment of Radiology, Radiooncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal and Ste Justine Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Ashley HarrisHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Catherine LebelAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ryan LamontAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tyler WilliamsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen Maria BarlowAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Francois BernierAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brian L BrooksAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Carolyn EmeryHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephen B FreedmanAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kristina KowalskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kelly MrklasResearch Innovation and Analytics, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lianne Tomfohr-MadsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kathryn J SchneiderHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPaediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a public health burden. Clinicians urgently need evidence-based guidance to manage mTBI, but gold standards for diagnosing and predicting the outcomes of mTBI are lacking. The objective of the Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics (A-CAP) study is to assess a broad pool of neurobiological and psychosocial markers to examine associations with postinjury outcomes in a large sample of children with either mTBI or orthopaedic injury (OI), with the goal of improving the diagnosis and prognostication of outcomes of paediatric mTBI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A-CAP is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of children aged 8.00-16.99 years with either mTBI or OI, recruited during acute emergency department (ED) visits at five sites from the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada network. Injury information is collected in the ED; follow-up assessments at 10 days and 3 and 6 months postinjury measure a variety of neurobiological and psychosocial markers, covariates/confounders and outcomes. Weekly postconcussive symptom ratings are obtained electronically. Recruitment began in September 2016 and will occur for approximately 24 months. Analyses will test the major hypotheses that neurobiological and psychosocial markers can: (1) differentiate mTBI from OI and (2) predict outcomes of mTBI. Models initially will focus within domains (eg, genes, imaging biomarkers, psychosocial markers), followed by multivariable modelling across domains. The planned sample size (700 mTBI, 300 OI) provides adequate statistical power and allows for internal cross-validation of some analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethics boards at all participating institutions have approved the study and all participants and their parents will provide informed consent or assent. Dissemination will follow an integrated knowledge translation plan, with study findings presented at scientific conferences and in multiple manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Glasgow Coma ScaleNeuropsychological TestsAdolescentCanadaChildEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMultivariate AnalysisPain MeasurementPost-Concussion SyndromeProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRegression Analysisneurological injurypaediatric neurologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID28710227
PMCPMC5724225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.