Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710226›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Evaluating the predictive strength of the LACE index in identifying patients at high risk of hospital readmission following an inpatient episode: a retrospective cohort study.

Sarah Damery, Gill Combes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05765903 (Readmission Risk Score), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05765903 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Readmission Risk Score (RecuR Score) Pilot at The University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center (UM CRMC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2024 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsPatient Readmission, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus Poor ControlArmsStandard of Care, Enhanced Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The predictive ability of EQ-5D-3L compared to the LACE index and its association with 30-day post-hospitalization outcomes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah DameryInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Gill CombesCLAHRC West Midlands Research Lead for Chronic Diseases Theme, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess how well the LACE index and its constituent elements predict 30-day hospital readmission, and to determine whether other combinations of clinical or sociodemographic variables may enhance prognostic capability.

designRetrospective cohort study with split sample design for model validation.

settingOne large hospital Trust in the West Midlands.

participantsAll alive-discharge adult inpatient episodes between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014. DATA SOURCES: Anonymised data for each inpatient episode were obtained from the hospital information system. These included age at index admission, gender, ethnicity, admission/discharge date, length of stay, treatment specialty, admission type and source, discharge destination, comorbidities, number of accident and emergency (A&E) visits in the 6 months before the index admission and whether a patient was readmitted within 30 days of index discharge. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and patient characteristics of readmission versus non-readmission episodes, proportion of readmission episodes at each LACE score, regression modelling of variables associated with readmission to assess the effectiveness of LACE and other variable combinations to predict 30-day readmission.

resultsThe training cohort included data on 91 922 patient episodes. Increasing LACE score and each of its individual components were independent predictors of readmission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.773; 95% CI 0.768 to 0.779 for LACE; AUC 0.806; 95% CI 0.801 to 0.812 for the four LACE components). A LACE score of 11 was most effective at distinguishing between higher and lower risk patients. However, only 25% of readmission episodes occurred in the higher scoring group. A model combining A&E visits and hospital episodes per patient in the previous year was more effective at predicting readmission (AUC 0.815; 95% CI 0.810 to 0.819).

conclusionsAlthough LACE shows good discriminatory power in statistical terms, it may have little added value over and above clinical judgement in predicting a patient's risk of hospital readmission.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient AcuityAdultAgedComorbidityFemaleHumansInpatientsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient ReadmissionPrognosisRetrospective Studiescase findinghospitalLACEreadmissionsrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID28710226
PMCPMC5726103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.