Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710221›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Trends in readmission rates for safety net hospitals and non-safety net hospitals in the era of the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: a retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from 2008 to 2015.

Amy M Salerno, Leora I Horwitz, Ji Young Kwon, Jeph Herrin, Jacqueline N Grady, Zhenqiu Lin, Joseph S Ross, Susannah M Bernheim

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Independent Associations of Neighborhood Deprivation and Patient-level Social Determinants of Health with Textbook Outcomes after Inpatient Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Association of Socioeconomic Area Deprivation Index with Hospital Readmissions After Colon and Rectal Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Public reporting on cardiac electrophysiology procedures and outcomes: where are we now and where are we headed?Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amy M SalernoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Leora I HorwitzCenter for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Ji Young KwonCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jeph HerrinSection of Cardiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jacqueline N GradyCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Zhenqiu LinCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Joseph S RossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Susannah M BernheimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Understanding hospital value: provider, hospital and community effectsR01HS022882 · AHRQ · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HORWITZ, LEORA · 2014 to 2023
$2.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022882NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare trends in readmission rates among safety net and non-safety net hospitals under the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP).

designA retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from January 2008 to June 2015.

settingWe examined 3254 US hospitals eligible for penalties under the HRRP, categorised as safety net or non-safety net hospitals based on the hospital's proportion of patients with low socioeconomic status.

participantsAdmissions for Medicare fee-for-service patients, age ≥65 years, discharged alive, who had a valid five-digit zip code and did not have a principal discharge diagnosis of cancer or psychiatric illness were included, for a total of 52 516 213 index admissions. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean hospital-level, all-condition, 30-day risk-adjusted standardised unplanned readmission rate, measured quarterly, along with quarterly rate of change, and an interrupted time series examining: April-June 2010, after HRRP was passed, and October-December 2012, after HRRP penalties were implemented.

results58.0% (SD 15.3) of safety net hospitals and 17.1% (SD 10.4) of non-safety net hospitals' patients were in the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status. The mean safety net hospital standardised readmission rate declined from 17.0% (SD 3.7) to 13.6% (SD 3.6), whereas the mean non-safety net hospital declined from 15.4% (SD 3.0) to 12.7% (SD 2.5). The absolute difference in rates between safety net and non-safety net hospitals declined from 1.6% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.9) to 0.9% (0.7 to 1.2). The quarterly decline in standardised readmission rates was 0.03 percentage points (95% CI 0.03 to 0.02, p<0.001) greater among safety net hospitals over the entire study period, and no differential change among safety net and non-safety net hospitals was found after either HRRP was passed or penalties enacted.

conclusionsSince HRRP was passed and penalties implemented, readmission rates for safety net hospitals have decreased more rapidly than those for non-safety net hospitals.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleMedicarePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesSafety-net ProvidersUnited StatesGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)Health policyQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID28710221
PMCPMC5541519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.