Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28710215›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

A study protocol for an observational cohort investigating COGnitive outcomes and WELLness in survivors of critical illness: the COGWELL study.

M Elizabeth Wilcox, Andrew S Lim, Mary P McAndrews, Richard A Wennberg, Ruxandra L Pinto, Sandra E Black, Karolina D Walczak, Jan O Friedrich, Michael S Taglione, Gordon D Rubenfeld

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02086877 (COGnitive Outcomes and WELLness in Survivors of Critical Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02086877 unknown statusnot on this map

COGnitive Outcomes and WELLness in Survivors of Critical Illness

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2014 to 2018Enrolled150ConditionsCritical Illness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M Elizabeth WilcoxDepartment of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Andrew S LimDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Mary P McAndrewsDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Richard A WennbergDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Ruxandra L PintoDepartment of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Sandra E BlackDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Karolina D WalczakDepartment of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Jan O FriedrichDepartment of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Michael S TaglioneDepartment of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Gordon D RubenfeldDepartment of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUp to 9 out of 10 intensive care unit (ICU) survivors will suffer some degree of cognitive impairment at hospital discharge and approximately half will have decrements that persist for years. The mechanisms for this newly acquired brain injury are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of sleep abnormalities and their association with cognitive impairment, examine a well-known genetic risk factor for dementia (Apolipoprotein E ε4) that may allow for genetic risk stratification of ICU survivors at greatest risk of cognitive impairment and determine if electroencephalography (EEG) is an independent predictor of long-term cognitive impairment and possibly a candidate intermediate end point for future clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multisite, prospective, observational cohort study. The setting for this trial will be medical and surgical ICUs of five large tertiary care referral centres. The participants will be adult patients admitted to a study ICU and invasively ventilated for ≥3 days . Participants will undergo follow-up within 7 days of ICU discharge, 6 months and 1 year. At each time point, patients will have an EEG, blood work (biomarkers; gene studies), sleep study (actigraphy), complete a number of questionnaires as well as undergo neuropsychological testing. The primary outcome of this study will be long-term cognitive function at 12 months follow-up as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status and Trails Making Test B. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received the following approvals: University Health Network Research Ethics Committee (13-6425-BE), Sunnybrook Health Centre Research Ethics Committee (365-2013), Mount Sinai Research Ethics Committee (14-0194-E) and St. Michael's Hospital Research Ethics Committee (14-295). Results will be made available to critical care survivors, their caregivers, the funders, the critical care societies and other researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02086877; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient DischargeAdolescentAdultAgedCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCritical IllnessFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOntarioProspective StudiesCritical Illness

Identifiers

PMID28710215
PMCPMC5734403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.